1992
DOI: 10.1109/14.123443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-aided recognition of discharge sources

Abstract: Making use of a computer-aided discharge analyzer, a combination of statistical and discharge parameters was studied to discriminate between different discharge sources. Tests on samples with different discharge sources revealed that several parameters are characteristic for different types of discharges and offer good discrimination between different defects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
81
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors [2,3,4] In [5] various descriptors as phase position, magnitude, shape, inception symmetry, pulse distribution, range, density and magnitude consistency are related, while [6,7] use two fractal features (fractal dimension and lacunarity) of the whole image for the pattern recognition.…”
Section: Features Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several authors [2,3,4] In [5] various descriptors as phase position, magnitude, shape, inception symmetry, pulse distribution, range, density and magnitude consistency are related, while [6,7] use two fractal features (fractal dimension and lacunarity) of the whole image for the pattern recognition.…”
Section: Features Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The limits of this sum must be corrected to include only those coecients which are not subject to to reection conditions and then obtain an unbiased estimator of the variance.…”
Section: Is a Stationary Process (Where D Is A Nonnegativementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first one is formation of so called Feature Vector or Fingerprint and the second one is pattern recognition phase (classification algorithm) itself. Over the last 15-20 years, several PD classification algorithms have been proposed and tested, including statistical tools, signal processing tools, image processing techniques, time-series analysis, fuzzy logic, artificial neural networks (ANN) and hybrid approaches, for both extraction of feature vector and classification [6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noise rejection techniques, based on the difference of pulse arrival time from two bus couplers [2], [4], pulse-by-pulse noise rejection methods using multiple sensors [3] and denoising method using wavelets [8] have been reported, as the attenuation and frequency content of the propagated PD and noise signals are different. After denoising, the type of developing PDs are identified using the hybrid clustering method, phase-resolved PD patterns, PD magnitude/number distribution, PD trend analysis, spectral analysis, PD-based indexes, and by determining statistical parameters [9], [10]. With single PD, propagation and attenuation characteristics at different electrical lengths [11], [12] are extensively evaluated to identify the location of PD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%