1973
DOI: 10.1109/t-ed.1973.17727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-aided two-dimensional analysis of bipolar transistors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We apply the standard Gummel iteration method [30] and traditional Slotboom formulation [31] for this purpose.…”
Section: Models and Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We apply the standard Gummel iteration method [30] and traditional Slotboom formulation [31] for this purpose.…”
Section: Models and Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slotboom proposed the following current density equations in terms of F n , F p , ϕ in the paper [31]:…”
Section: Models and Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last two decades, several computer-simulation programs have been written with the aim of finding the potential and mobile charge density distribution in conventional devices [2][3][4][5][6], Ravailoli et al [7] and Kerkhoven et al [8,9] have reported self-consistent computations of the electronic states of a quantum wire while Kumar et al [10][11][12] have presented self-consistent numerical solutions of the Poisson and Schrödinger equations for a GaAs-Al x Ga 1−x As quantum dot. Kerkhoven et al [8,9] work is for two-dimensional (2D) devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the diffusion-dominated regime, (33) degenerates into the classical (optimal) O(h) estimate for the P 1 conforming finite elements, since ∇ψ ∞,T h → 0 (or, equivalently, ∆ψ M,T h → 0), and B(±η) → 1 for η → 0. In the presence of a large potential drop across the mesh element T (i.e., for fixed mesh size h, when ∇ψ ∞,T h ≈ 1), it turns out that B(−η) → η, for η 1, so that the approximation error (33) is of order ∆ψ…”
Section: Remark 32mentioning
confidence: 99%