2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-Assisted Designed and Computer-Assisted Manufactured Polyetheretherketone Prosthesis for Complex Fronto-Orbito-Temporal Defect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…11 Various materials are available for the reconstruction of craniofacial defects, ranging from the autogenous bone grafts to titanium meshes, osteoinductive and osteoconductive cements, and other biomaterials. 11,12 All options have advantages and disadvantages, and no single ideal material for this has yet been found. 11 The literature presents several options of polymers for the reconstruction of cranial defects, which present desirable characteristics for reconstructions such as the following: (1) they have suitable resistance for the reconstruction of extensive total defects; (2) they are radiolucent but not ferromagnetic, allowing postoperative control with CT scans and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (NMRI)/MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11 Various materials are available for the reconstruction of craniofacial defects, ranging from the autogenous bone grafts to titanium meshes, osteoinductive and osteoconductive cements, and other biomaterials. 11,12 All options have advantages and disadvantages, and no single ideal material for this has yet been found. 11 The literature presents several options of polymers for the reconstruction of cranial defects, which present desirable characteristics for reconstructions such as the following: (1) they have suitable resistance for the reconstruction of extensive total defects; (2) they are radiolucent but not ferromagnetic, allowing postoperative control with CT scans and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (NMRI)/MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various materials are available for the reconstruction of craniofacial defects, ranging from the autogenous bone grafts to titanium meshes, osteoinductive and osteoconductive cements, and other biomaterials 1112. All options have advantages and disadvantages, and no single ideal material for this has yet been found 11…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cranioplasty has improved over the past two decades. [ 5 6 7 8 ] In reconstructive surgery, replacing missing structures with those most similar to them are fundamental dogma. In the case of cranioplasty, vascularized bone has the highest similarity to the native calvaria and is therefore our preferred reconstructive material when possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A customized medical implant and surgical resection template that matches skeletal anatomy can now be accurately designed using the CAD technique. The physical model of the individual implant, template, or skull replica can be produced through 3D printing, rapid tooling (RT), and computer aided manufacturing/computer numerical control (CAM/ CNC) processes [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. This paper presents some clinical cases, where virtual models have been used for surgical preparations and 3D printing models for manufacturing of implants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%