2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5121444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-automated tuning procedures for semiconductor quantum dot arrays

Abstract: As with any quantum computing platform, semiconductor quantum dot devices require sophisticated hardware and controls for operation. The increasing complexity of quantum dot devices necessitates the advancement of automated control software and image recognition techniques for rapidly evaluating charge stability diagrams. We use an image analysis toolbox developed in Python to automate the calibration of virtual gates, a process that previously involved a large amount of user intervention. Moreover, we show th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two extra quantum dots placed above the main-dot array serve as charge sensors and are configured for rf reflectometry [37,38]. We tune the confinement potential using "virtual gates" [26,30,[39][40][41] such that each dot contains only one electron. We define virtual-plunger-gate voltages P 1 , P 2 , P 3 , and P 4 as linear combinations of the physicalplunger-gate voltages (p 1 , p 2 , p 3 , p 4 ) such that changes to P i are proportional to changes in the electrochemical potential of dot i.…”
Section: Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Two extra quantum dots placed above the main-dot array serve as charge sensors and are configured for rf reflectometry [37,38]. We tune the confinement potential using "virtual gates" [26,30,[39][40][41] such that each dot contains only one electron. We define virtual-plunger-gate voltages P 1 , P 2 , P 3 , and P 4 as linear combinations of the physicalplunger-gate voltages (p 1 , p 2 , p 3 , p 4 ) such that changes to P i are proportional to changes in the electrochemical potential of dot i.…”
Section: Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonlinear and nonlocal dependence of exchange couplings on the barrier-gate voltages, which results from position shifts of the quantum dots, poses a challenge to implementing simultaneous exchange coupling between all dots in an extended array. Previous work has investigated how to adjust multiple interdot tunnel couplings iteratively [26,30]. Here, we discuss two different models that allow us to determine the virtual-gate voltages given a set of target exchange couplings.…”
Section: Modeling the Dependence Of Exchange Coupling On All Barrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the transport features that indicate the device is tuned as a double quantum dot are time-consuming to measure and difficult to parametrise. Machine learning techniques and other automated approaches have been used for tuning quantum devices [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] . These techniques are limited to small regions of the device parameter space or require information about the device characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the interdot tunnel coupling is approximately an exponential function of the gate voltages [10,16,17], and so far it has remained unclear how to incorporate this nonlinear dependence into the crosstalk matrix. Therefore, tuning of multiple tunnel couplings in a multidot device is mostly done by iteratively adjusting gate voltages using manual or computer-automated procedures [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%