1970
DOI: 10.1002/tea.3660070307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer‐based teaching techniques in general chemistry

Abstract: Statement of the ProblemThis study consisted of four major parts:(1) development of computer programs for use in an introductory college chemistry course; (2) an evaluation of the program in light of specific behavioral objectives, (3) an analysis of the extent to which the programs have provided for individual differences; and (4) a description and a general evaluation of the manner in which the programs functioned, in terms of logistics and administration, as a supplement to the introductory chemistry course… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ratio of boys to girls involved with computers appears to increase the more advanced, effortful, or costly the level of involvement (Hess & Miura, in press; Kiesler, Sproull, & Eccles, 1983). A number of studies have found no difference between boys and girls in attitudes toward learning with computers (Castleberry, Montague, & Lagowski, 1970), although girls may be more apprehensive about computer-assisted instruction than boys. Another purpose of the present study, therefore, was to compare the results of computer-assisted cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning on male and female students.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio of boys to girls involved with computers appears to increase the more advanced, effortful, or costly the level of involvement (Hess & Miura, in press; Kiesler, Sproull, & Eccles, 1983). A number of studies have found no difference between boys and girls in attitudes toward learning with computers (Castleberry, Montague, & Lagowski, 1970), although girls may be more apprehensive about computer-assisted instruction than boys. Another purpose of the present study, therefore, was to compare the results of computer-assisted cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning on male and female students.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%