1973
DOI: 10.1016/0010-4655(73)90016-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer generation of Feynman diagrams for perturbation theory I. General algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2.174), and writing I l ) = IQ(0)) see that we can calculate the expectation value as 74) we (6) = (Ql6lQ)/(QlQ) = =I (2.175) and similarly for higher order properties. (Cf., e.g., [14,216,320].)…”
Section: F Coupled-cluster Approaches To Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2.174), and writing I l ) = IQ(0)) see that we can calculate the expectation value as 74) we (6) = (Ql6lQ)/(QlQ) = =I (2.175) and similarly for higher order properties. (Cf., e.g., [14,216,320].)…”
Section: F Coupled-cluster Approaches To Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We must emphasize here that although these equations were actually written down only for the most important case of pair (i.e., doubly excited) cluster components (i.e., for the approximation T M T2), referred to originally as coupled-pair many-electron theory (CPMET [72], or CCD in today's terminology), the diagrammatic formulation of Cizek [ 1,2] is completely general, making it straightforward to obtain coupled-cluster equations at any level of approximation. Clearly, the required labor increases with the excitation level at which one truncates the cluster expansion (cf., e.g., [73]), but, should one require a high-order formalism, the procedure can be easily automated (cf., e.g., [74]). However, while it is easy to generate the required equations, it is not at all easy to exploit them computationally in practical applications in view of the rapidly increasing dimensionality of higher order cluster amplitudes.…”
Section: A Historical Outlinementioning
confidence: 98%
“…(17), we can expect to obtain identical contributions from distinct MBPT diagrams, namely, from those which can be transformed one into the other by a simple particle-hole (p-h) exchange or by the p-h exchange followed by the time-reversal (hereafter designated as conjugation) [42]. Since both operations are idempotent, we shall denote the corresponding second-order groups formed by these operations as c = { 1, conjugation) and e = { 1, p-h exchange}, where 1 designates the neutral (identity) operation.…”
Section: E(4)=ae(2)+ae(3)+ae(4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The essentially distin$ [42] Hugenholtz diagrams of type (ii) (i-e., containing simultaneously and V, vertices) and their notation are shown in Figure 1. All nonequivalent MBPT diagrams are then obtained from those of Figure 1 In the third order, the canonical particle-particle and hole-hole diagrams [cf., e.g., Fig.…”
Section: E(4)=ae(2)+ae(3)+ae(4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation