2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-015-1194-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer implementations of iterative and non-iterative crystal plasticity solvers on high performance graphics hardware

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1)when using nonphysically low values ofnis a well-recognized problem.One approach, known as the spectral crystal plasticity can circumvents solving the power-law equation and instead evaluates the Fourier series summation of spectral coefficients and Fourier basis [58][59][60][61]. The method was found suitable for high-performance computational implementations of crystal plasticity [62,63].…”
Section: Rate-dependent Onset Of Slip Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1)when using nonphysically low values ofnis a well-recognized problem.One approach, known as the spectral crystal plasticity can circumvents solving the power-law equation and instead evaluates the Fourier series summation of spectral coefficients and Fourier basis [58][59][60][61]. The method was found suitable for high-performance computational implementations of crystal plasticity [62,63].…”
Section: Rate-dependent Onset Of Slip Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus this computationally efficient tool leads to major savings of computational cost in FLD predictions. Interestingly, it has been demonstrated by (Knezevic and Savage, 2014;Mihaila et al, 2014;Savage and Knezevic, 2015) that there can be a further gain in the computational speed of SCP compared to CP, if the computations are performed on a specialized computer hardware that utilizes graphics-processing units (GPU). Thus, there is clear potential to further speed up the SCP-FLD tool presented here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The viability and the computational benefits of using the DFT approach (for facilitating crystal plasticity solutions) have already been highlighted in prior work (cf. Knezevic et al, 2008Knezevic et al, , 2009Kalidindi et al, 2009;Alharbi et al, 2010;Knezevic and Savage, 2014;Mihaila et al, 2014;Savage and Knezevic, 2015;Alharbi and Kalidindi, 2015;Zecevic et al, 2015;Eghtesad et al, 2017;Knezevic and Kalidindi, 2017). In particular, the accuracy and computational savings of the DFT database approach compared to the conventional Taylor-type approach have been demonstrated by Knezevic et al (2009) and Alharbi and Kalidindi (2015) for both monotonic and non-monotonic strain paths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where is the slip rate on slip system s , is the plastic velocity gradient, is the identity matrix, and and are the slip direction and the slip plane normal of s, respectively, in the undeformed configuration denoted by 0. The is related to the resolved shear stress ( • ⨂ ⨂ ) and a characteristic shear stress (τ c s ) for slip system s, according to a power-law relationship [39][40][41]:…”
Section: Summary Of the Cpfe Constitutive Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%