1985
DOI: 10.1002/pi.4980170220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer simulation of urethane formation

Abstract: Computer model calculations have been used to simulate the reaction of polyoxypropylene triol with hexamethylene diisocyanate. Various molecular weight distributions and degrees of polymerisation are used in the calculation. The effect of side reactions is investigated and compared with experiment. Good agreement for both cyclisation and gel points is found for bulk and concentrated solutions. The model can be used to simulate random polycondensation reactions with a reliability approaching that of experiments… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average between the upper and lower bounds gives the critical reaction extent p c at the gel point. Using this upper-lower bound method to estimate the gel point, they obtained results with very good agreement between simulations [32] and measurements. [33] Figure 2 shows the reaction extent dependence of DP w and RDP w for f ¼ 0.3, r ¼ 1 and N 0 ¼ 20.…”
Section: Determination Of the Gel Pointmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The average between the upper and lower bounds gives the critical reaction extent p c at the gel point. Using this upper-lower bound method to estimate the gel point, they obtained results with very good agreement between simulations [32] and measurements. [33] Figure 2 shows the reaction extent dependence of DP w and RDP w for f ¼ 0.3, r ¼ 1 and N 0 ¼ 20.…”
Section: Determination Of the Gel Pointmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Much preferred became the off-lattice models. [19][20][21][22][23][24] The most theoretically studied gelling system was the model of step-growth homopolymeri-zation of an A f monomer ( f ¼ 3, 4,..). [17,[25][26][27] Another widely studied system was the one comprising A f and B g (or RA f and R'B g ) monomers (f > 1, g > 2), which is more relevant to real systems (A and B denote the kinds of functional groups that are capable to react with each other, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, most of the assumptions made in the first percolation experiments were hard to accept by chemists studying real polymerization systems. Much preferred became the off‐lattice models 19–24. The most theoretically studied gelling system was the model of step‐growth homopolymeri‐zation of an A f monomer ( f = 3, 4,..) 17, 25–27.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the distances between reactive groups are large, the Gaussian approximation is adequate; if they are short, sampling from RIS configurations will more accurately represent the correlations between reactive groups. The coordinates of the reactive groups do not change as the reaction proceeds, and bond formation is effected by the use of “capture spheres.” A capture sphere represents the average volume through which a reactive site would diffuse in a unit of time. The reaction is controlled by allowing bond formation between polymer and end-linker reactive sites when the distance between them is within the capture radius.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coordinates of the reactive groups do not change as the reaction proceeds, and bond formation is effected by the use of "capture spheres." [40][41][42][43] A capture sphere represents the average volume through which a reactive site would diffuse in a unit of time. The reaction is controlled by allowing bond formation between polymer and endlinker reactive sites when the distance between them is within the capture radius.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%