1990
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(90)90063-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerized tomography versus perfusion lung scanning in canine radiation lung injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 In the absence of a more specific indicator, it is therefore reasonable to use perfusion imaging to estimate a relative functional status. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] There are certainly potential shortcomings in using this technique for estimating lung functional status. For example, perfusion to a region might be reduced due to the obstruction of proximal blood vessels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 In the absence of a more specific indicator, it is therefore reasonable to use perfusion imaging to estimate a relative functional status. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] There are certainly potential shortcomings in using this technique for estimating lung functional status. For example, perfusion to a region might be reduced due to the obstruction of proximal blood vessels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of nuclear medicine functional imaging to lung dose-response (DR) analysis in radiotherapy has also been the topic of recent research , and is the motivation for this present work. Currently, anatomical imaging techniques such as computed tomography [8] and magnetic resonance imaging [9] standard modalities for monitoring the effects of radiation therapy on lung tissue. However, the appropriateness of these modalities for obtaining information on post-treatment changes in lung function remains unclear [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%