2000
DOI: 10.1097/00131746-200009000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerizing Medication Algorithms and Decision Support Systems for Major

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Means to achieve remission have been the focus of large-scale investigations. Algorithm-based approaches, such as studied in the TMAP (“Texas Medication Algorithm Project”, Rush et al, 1999; Trivedi et al, 2000) and STAR*D trials, provide an evidence base for selecting subsequent treatments, but these decisions are made for individual patients only after a remission has failed to occur despite an adequate trial of a particular intervention, a process which takes weeks to months for each sequential trial. The duration of algorithm-based treatment could be shortened if practitioners could identify, early in a treatment phase, those individuals who are unlikely to remit, and institute different, augmented, and/or more complex treatments sooner for those patients who need them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Means to achieve remission have been the focus of large-scale investigations. Algorithm-based approaches, such as studied in the TMAP (“Texas Medication Algorithm Project”, Rush et al, 1999; Trivedi et al, 2000) and STAR*D trials, provide an evidence base for selecting subsequent treatments, but these decisions are made for individual patients only after a remission has failed to occur despite an adequate trial of a particular intervention, a process which takes weeks to months for each sequential trial. The duration of algorithm-based treatment could be shortened if practitioners could identify, early in a treatment phase, those individuals who are unlikely to remit, and institute different, augmented, and/or more complex treatments sooner for those patients who need them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These areas include electronic documentation and information retrieval [18], physician order entry and adverse drug events [19], [20] as well as preventive care and follow-up [21], [ 22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While efforts to promote current advances in pharmacology have resulted in a surge of consensus guidelines, finding an effective dissemination method continues to be the greatest challenge (Davis et al, 1995;Gorton et al, 1995;Trivedi et al, 2000;Trivedi et al, 2002;Trivedi et al, 2004a). Despite wide promotion, clinical practice guidelines have had limited effect in changing physician behavior (Hayward 1997;Lomas et al, 1989).…”
Section: Barriers To Dissemination and Implementation Of Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous attempts to implement guidelines for MDD using a paper-and-pencil format in clinical settings (Trivedi et al, 2004b;Trivedi et al, 2006c;Trivedi et al, 2007) have revealed problems with fidelity in terms of dosing, adequate duration of treatment, and visit frequency. One possible solution to this problem is to couple guidelines with a measurement-based, computerized approach (Hunt et al, 1998;Trivedi et al, 2000;Trivedi et al, 2001;Trivedi et al, 2002;Trivedi et al, 2004a). There is already evidence of improved physician fidelity to guidelines using this approach, suggesting that providing immediate decision support at the point of care via a comprehensive electronic health record could improve physician adherence and clinical outcomes Trivedi et al, 2002;Trivedi et al, 2004a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%