2001
DOI: 10.1109/5992.947109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computers in imaging and guided surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique has been evaluated with 0.5-1 mm translation error and 1-1.5 ° orientation error (YAO et al, 2000), and another group obtained errors of 2 mm and 1 ° (GuEZIEC et al, 1998). There is therefore interest in a sufficiently accurate intra-operative registration procedure, without pins, that compromises the complexity, safety or length of the surgical procedure as little as possible (JOSKOWICZ and TAYLOR, 2001). Given these constraints, the most promising solution seems to be touch-based registration, in which the robot itself acquires information about bone geometry by touching a series of reachable points on the bone surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This technique has been evaluated with 0.5-1 mm translation error and 1-1.5 ° orientation error (YAO et al, 2000), and another group obtained errors of 2 mm and 1 ° (GuEZIEC et al, 1998). There is therefore interest in a sufficiently accurate intra-operative registration procedure, without pins, that compromises the complexity, safety or length of the surgical procedure as little as possible (JOSKOWICZ and TAYLOR, 2001). Given these constraints, the most promising solution seems to be touch-based registration, in which the robot itself acquires information about bone geometry by touching a series of reachable points on the bone surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In orthopaedic applications, such as total hip or knee replacement surgery, computer navigation systems use 3D digital models during pre-and intraoperative planning. These systems employ dedicated software applications known as 'surgical planners' (Joskowicz and Taylor 2001;Sato et al 2004;Holly 2006) to help surgeons place prosthetic components precisely and accurately. The digital representations of the anatomical structures needed for these applications are generated by evaluating data volumes from computer tomography or magnetic resonance or by manual or semiautomatic elaboration of medical images such as fluoroscopy projections and X-ray images (Mahaisavariya et al 2002;Kim et al 2004;De Momi et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past 20 years, technological advancements have modified the concept of modern operating rooms (ORs) with the introduction of computer‐integrated surgery (CIS) systems, which promise to enhance the outcome, safety and standardization of surgical procedures .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%