2018 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iscas.2018.8351774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing in the Fog with Reconfigurable Gateways

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Amongst publish-subscribe protocols, several stand out, such as Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) and Data Distribution Service (DDS). In [22], an evaluation emphasizes that DDS outperforms MQTT by comparing latencies, which highlights its real-time capabilities. The DDS-based network is composed of topics, an application-specific data domain made by the user e.g.…”
Section: Global Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amongst publish-subscribe protocols, several stand out, such as Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) and Data Distribution Service (DDS). In [22], an evaluation emphasizes that DDS outperforms MQTT by comparing latencies, which highlights its real-time capabilities. The DDS-based network is composed of topics, an application-specific data domain made by the user e.g.…”
Section: Global Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It brings all the software and hardware building blocks to decentralize processing to the edges of the network. In [21], we were introducing this project combining local processing, with completely decentralized communications and configurability, so that a network can cooperate in the most efficient way. As a point of comparison, the Open IoT gateway in [22] is very configurable, but operates on a Cloud-based network, and the Smart Gateway presented in [23] uses Message Queuing Telemetry Transport as a communication protocol, while we chose Data Distribution Service as the communication protocol.…”
Section: Figure 26 Terminal Qui Affiche Les Données Capteursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of communication protocol, in the context of IoT especially for edge-computing purposes, the publish-subscribe pattern is more appropriate than server-client. It has been demonstrated in [21] that Data Distribution Service (DDS) outperforms Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) when comparing latencies, which emphasizes its real-time capabilities, despite that bandwidth requirements are larger for DDS. However, the fact that data are potentially processed locally in the gateway decreases bandwidth needs.…”
Section: Figure 26 Terminal Qui Affiche Les Données Capteursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No estado atual das tecnologias de comunicação, predominam as arquiteturas centralizadas em data centers, com o compartilhamento de recursos através de serviços baseados em nuvem (cloud-based services), concentrando o poder de processamento e armazenamento nos data centers. Esse modelo de arquitetura pode se tornar insustentável para o contexto das IoTs, não havendo precedentes em termos da quantidade de dispositivos conectados, impondo alta carga de requisições frente aos desa os inerentes à latência de rede, largura de banda, con abilidade e segurança (Laurent et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Nesse modelo, provê-se os dispositivos/objetos com maior capacidade de processamento, armazenamento e comunicação, a m de diminuir o volume e a frequência de troca de informações oriúndas desses dispositivos. Desta forma, equipa-se melhor a borda da rede (com a adoção de gateways), possibilitando uma gerência mais acurada em termos de atuação sobre os objetos e de comunicação da borda com a nuvem (Laurent et al, 2018). Ou seja, no modelo baseado estritamente na nuvem, a inteligência dos dispositivos está centrada em um único ponto e resultando, sobretudo, em altas latências e mesmo indisponibilidade de atuação e controle sobre os objetos.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified