2023
DOI: 10.6339/23-jds1094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing Pseudolikelihood Estimators for Exponential-Family Random Graph Models

Abstract: The reputation of the maximum pseudolikelihood estimator (MPLE) for Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGM) has undergone a drastic change over the past 30 years. While first receiving broad support, mainly due to its computational feasibility and the lack of alternatives, general opinions started to change with the introduction of approximate maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) methods that became practicable due to increasing computing power and the introduction of MCMC methods. Previous comparison studies app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They present an empirical evaluation of this testing method for linear regression, and briefly discuss an extension of this method to nonlinear applications. Schmid and Hunter (2023) proposes to estimate maximum pseudolikelihood estimator standard errors for exponential random graph models using an estimated Godambe matrix. Their results provide empirical evidence for the asymptotic normality of the maximum pseudolikelihood estimator under certain conditions.…”
Section: Data Science In Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They present an empirical evaluation of this testing method for linear regression, and briefly discuss an extension of this method to nonlinear applications. Schmid and Hunter (2023) proposes to estimate maximum pseudolikelihood estimator standard errors for exponential random graph models using an estimated Godambe matrix. Their results provide empirical evidence for the asymptotic normality of the maximum pseudolikelihood estimator under certain conditions.…”
Section: Data Science In Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, K, with these MPLEs adjusted by network size by specifying in each ERGM an offset term |x| (edge count of network x) with fixed coefficient log 1 n (Krivitsky et al 2011). The MPLE (e.g., Schmid & Hunter, 2023) was introduced for lattice models (Besag, 1974), and developed to estimate ERGM parameters (Strauss & Ikeda, 1990;Frank & Strauss, 1986) because the exact MLE of the ERGM is intractable for a binary network with more than a handful of nodes n, as mentioned above. Specifically, for example, if the observed network dataset x is an undirected binary network, x = (x i,j ∈ {0, 1}) n×n on n nodes, described by scalar or vector valued statistics g k (x) for k = 1, .…”
Section: Overview Of Network Data Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%