2021
DOI: 10.1137/19m1304738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing Shapley Effects for Sensitivity Analysis

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, [13] proposed a subset aggregation procedure which leads to a significant reduction of the variance of Shapley effect estimation. Let us also cite the algorithm proposed in [17] based on the Möbius inverse, which offers a computationally efficient alternative for the estimation of Shapley effects, the simple Monte Carlo sampling-based algorithm proposed in [18] focused on independent inputs but which can be extended with a loss of efficiency to the dependent framework. The main advantage of the subset aggregation procedure introduced in [13] is that it has a version, based on nearest-neighbors, which does not require the ability to sample from the exact conditional distributions of the input parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, [13] proposed a subset aggregation procedure which leads to a significant reduction of the variance of Shapley effect estimation. Let us also cite the algorithm proposed in [17] based on the Möbius inverse, which offers a computationally efficient alternative for the estimation of Shapley effects, the simple Monte Carlo sampling-based algorithm proposed in [18] focused on independent inputs but which can be extended with a loss of efficiency to the dependent framework. The main advantage of the subset aggregation procedure introduced in [13] is that it has a version, based on nearest-neighbors, which does not require the ability to sample from the exact conditional distributions of the input parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of game theory, the authors of [8] presented a first algorithm to estimate the Shapley effects which was improved by [48] in sensitivity analysis by reducing the number of calls to the function φ. New approaches [5,38,18] and surrogate-model-based strategies [25,2] were explored to reduce even more the estimation cost of these indices while the articles [4,6] were focused on the estimation of the Shapley effects with independent groups of variable.…”
Section: Shapley Effect Estimation Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To fully understand factor prioritization the ability to parse out the mutual information between two inputs when dependencies exist is necessary. Furthermore, in general it is not the case that the introduction of correlations will strictly decrease the Shapley indicator, as the nature of the input-output map and input dependency structure both play a role [16,19].…”
Section: Linear System With Variance-based Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key advances to GSA include the introduction of momentindependent sensitivity analysis (MISA) [7], multivariate-output aggregation [8,9,10], goal-oriented GSA [11], and frameworks for systems with input-input correlations [12,13]. In particular, Shapley effects have been of growing interest as a method when dependencies exist amongst the inputs [14,15,13,16,17,18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%