2022
DOI: 10.1007/jhep07(2022)135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing the gauge-invariant bubble nucleation rate in finite temperature effective field theory

Abstract: A gauge-invariant framework for computing bubble nucleation rates at finite temperature in the presence of radiative barriers was presented and advocated for model-building and phenomenological studies in an accompanying article [1]. Here, we detail this computation using the Abelian Higgs Model as an illustrative example. Subsequently, we recast this approach in the dimensionally-reduced high-temperature effective field theory for nucleation. This allows for including several higher order thermal resummations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
(303 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These three problems-in addition to gauge dependence [57,60,64]-result in order-ofmagnitude uncertainties for the rate. This is important as these uncertainties propagate to gravitational-wave predictions [17,58].…”
Section: Uncertainties For Thermal Escapementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These three problems-in addition to gauge dependence [57,60,64]-result in order-ofmagnitude uncertainties for the rate. This is important as these uncertainties propagate to gravitational-wave predictions [17,58].…”
Section: Uncertainties For Thermal Escapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…effective theory can be used to both calculate equilibrium quantities and the nucleation rate [46,47,63,64].…”
Section: Jhep08(2022)115mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent work has described how to extend such a computation to higher orders [64][65][66][67] (also c.f. [68][69][70]). In the work at hand, we will not focus on such an improvement for the bubble nucleation rate, but instead treat T n as an input parameter that we vary; once its computation at higher orders is available, our results for the pressure, sound speed and the kinetic energy fraction can be used to determine the actual effect on GW power spectra.…”
Section: Computation Of the Pressure And Sound Speedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all following plots, we demonstrate the results obtained in the 3d EFT with fixed RG scales 3 . It should be noted that an accurate prediction of the gravitational wave spectrum depends on the nucleation temperature, which enters in H * , R * , f p,0 and K. A self-consistent determination of the nucleation temperature requires a computation of the bubble nucleation rate within the 3d nucleation EFT [65] (for applications, see [64,69]). This goes beyond the scope of this work.…”
Section: Impact On Gravitational Wave Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation