2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10995-012-0982-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing Theoretical Rates of Part C Eligibility Based on Developmental Delays

Abstract: Part C early intervention is a nationwide program that serves infants and toddlers who have developmental delays. This article presents a methodology for computing a theoretical estimate of the proportion of children who are likely to be eligible for Part C services based on delays in any of the 5 developmental domains (cognitive, motor, communication, social-emotional and adaptive) that are assessed to determine eligibility. Rates of developmental delays were estimated from a multivariate normal cumulative di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This represents about 5% of the sample. This percent of outliers is between the prevalence data of 13% for developmental disabilities and the 1.5–2% estimates for prevalence data of ASD 84,85 . Longitudinal follow up will confirm if around 3% of this sample will have closely related developmental disorders affecting language or developmental delays that do not fulfill full criteria for autism.…”
Section: Proof Of Principle: Anomaly Detection As a Computational Examentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This represents about 5% of the sample. This percent of outliers is between the prevalence data of 13% for developmental disabilities and the 1.5–2% estimates for prevalence data of ASD 84,85 . Longitudinal follow up will confirm if around 3% of this sample will have closely related developmental disorders affecting language or developmental delays that do not fulfill full criteria for autism.…”
Section: Proof Of Principle: Anomaly Detection As a Computational Examentioning
confidence: 79%
“…For example, Hispanic and Black families are less likely to be referred to high-risk infant follow up programs [6] and Black families are five to eight times less likely to follow up at the 24 month visit in early intervention programs [7]. Disparities in transition-to-home and follow-up for families who have limited English proficiency and/or are minorities or low-income exist and may be reduced by engaging families in the process of re-designing transition of care from NICU-to-home [3,4,[8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although developmental delays are relatively common, and the importance of early intervention is well-established (Pinto-Martin, Dunkle, Earls, Fliedner, & Landes, 2005;Ramey & Ramey, 2004), only a small proportion of young children with delays actually receive intervention services. The estimated prevalence of developmental delay is 17%, or one in six, of all children under age 5 (Boyle et al, 2011), and 10% to 12% of children under age 3 (Rosenberg, Ellison, Fast, Robinson, & Lazar, 2013;Sices, 2007); yet the percentage of children in the United States under-availability of programs, narrow eligibility criteria, funding, and poor interagency linkages and coordination (Coulter, Wallace, & Laude, 1993;Halfon et al, 2004;Marshall, Kirby, & Gorski, 2016;Marshall & Mendez, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%