2018
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Con: Contrast-induced nephropathy—should we try to avoid contrast media in patients with chronic kidney disease?

Abstract: The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) attributed to iodinated contrast has been over-estimated and this has led clinicians to withhold potentially life-saving diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. There is mounting evidence that iodinated contrast plays only a minor role in the development of AKI in comparison with more significant risk factors such as pre-existing renal dysfunction, hemodynamic instability and exposure to nephrotoxic drugs. We will present data which challenge the dogma of avoiding i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The opponents declare that the risk of CI-AKI has been overestimated, and it is often caused by a combination of other risk factors including older age, sepsis, hemodynamic instability, and comorbid diseases, which is independent of CM administration. 38 The pros claim that CM-based imaging should be employed with great restraint in patients with CKD as diagnostic alternatives exist for various clinical scenarios. 37 We believe that all non-CM methods should be exhausted first in medical decision-making, and it is still preferable to apply iodinated CM if alternate options are comparatively ineffective or even hazardous, such as dealing with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opponents declare that the risk of CI-AKI has been overestimated, and it is often caused by a combination of other risk factors including older age, sepsis, hemodynamic instability, and comorbid diseases, which is independent of CM administration. 38 The pros claim that CM-based imaging should be employed with great restraint in patients with CKD as diagnostic alternatives exist for various clinical scenarios. 37 We believe that all non-CM methods should be exhausted first in medical decision-making, and it is still preferable to apply iodinated CM if alternate options are comparatively ineffective or even hazardous, such as dealing with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrast nephrotoxicity is practically nonexistent in isolation and usually develops in association with conco mitant insults such as hypotension, dehydration, admini stration of other nephrotoxins (e.g. antibiotics), and under lying comorbidities 4,5) . The coexistence of several such triggers is not uncommon, particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although nephrotoxicity is evident in all iodine CM, the association between CM use and the development of AKI remains controversial [ 30 ]. Pre-existing renal insufficiency, acute hyperglycemia, nephrotoxic drugs, and other variables were also found to be important risk factors for AKI in patients exposed to CM [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%