ICC 91 International Conference on Communications Conference Record
DOI: 10.1109/icc.1991.162363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concatenated coding scheme employing soft decision for outer codes-DSD (double soft decision) concatenated coding system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of this investigation was to examine the error location performance from the rate-1/2 Viterbi decoding process and its output, where each computer run was 500,000 bits long. There are two key performance parameters: A = (number of bits deleted by a specific error location technique)/(total number of bits in one run), which is used to estimate the efficiency, and 6 = (number of error digits deleted)/(total number 6 for various values of X, Y, 2, n, and n,, with n, = 15: metric differences (the unit for both A and 6 is per cent) SER: of error digits before error deletion), which is used to estimate the accuracy. In the following, we shall summarize our computer simulation study results.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this investigation was to examine the error location performance from the rate-1/2 Viterbi decoding process and its output, where each computer run was 500,000 bits long. There are two key performance parameters: A = (number of bits deleted by a specific error location technique)/(total number of bits in one run), which is used to estimate the efficiency, and 6 = (number of error digits deleted)/(total number 6 for various values of X, Y, 2, n, and n,, with n, = 15: metric differences (the unit for both A and 6 is per cent) SER: of error digits before error deletion), which is used to estimate the accuracy. In the following, we shall summarize our computer simulation study results.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%