1992
DOI: 10.1159/000156600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Concealed Ovulation’ and Sexual Signals in Primates

Abstract: The absence of conspicuous sexual signals in some primates, particularly humans and vervets, has been interpreted as evidence that females of these species are ‘concealing’ ovulation from males. This conclusion is unjustified: the null hypothesis of no adaptation, that the absence of conspicuous sexual signals has resulted from the absence of selective pressures maintaining such adaptations, is both more parsimonious and better fits the facts. The related suggestion that there has been adaptation among females… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because, unlike humans, female chimpanzees undergo conspicuous cyclical changes in perineal morphology that index current fertility in a probabilistic manner and are attractive to males (Wallis 1992;Nunn 1999). Earlier hypotheses on this topic often assumed conspicuous cyclical changes to be the ancestral state for humans (e.g., Burt 1992). More recent phylogenetic analyses, however, suggest this may not be the case (Sillén-Tullberg and Møller 1993;Nunn 1999;Duda and Zrzavý 2013).…”
Section: Concealed Ovulation As An Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because, unlike humans, female chimpanzees undergo conspicuous cyclical changes in perineal morphology that index current fertility in a probabilistic manner and are attractive to males (Wallis 1992;Nunn 1999). Earlier hypotheses on this topic often assumed conspicuous cyclical changes to be the ancestral state for humans (e.g., Burt 1992). More recent phylogenetic analyses, however, suggest this may not be the case (Sillén-Tullberg and Møller 1993;Nunn 1999;Duda and Zrzavý 2013).…”
Section: Concealed Ovulation As An Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without specific education and training, most women do not know when they are ovulating because there are few obvious signals indicating a woman's fertility . For example, whereas ovulation in female chimpanzees is accompanied by bright redness and swelling in the rump, humans do not exhibit such overt bodily markers of ovulation (Burt 1992). …”
Section: The Human Ovulatory Cycle and Hormonal Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occurrence of hydatidiform moles appears to be restricted to humans, with the exception of one case of a partial mole observed at necropsy of a pregnant chimpanzee that died of other causes (158). A possible explanation is that concealed ovulation of humans (159) results in a high frequency of mistimed copulations: The sperm may arrive after the ovum has begun to degenerate.…”
Section: Hydatidiform Molar Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%