Concentrated Ionic Fluids: Is There a Difference Between Chloride‐Based Brines and Deep Eutectic Solvents?

Abstract

Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs) have been lauded as novel solvents, but is there really a difference between them and concentrated aqueous brines? They provide a method of adjusting the activity of water and chloride ions which can affect mass transport, speciation and reactivity. This study proposes a continuum of properties across concentrated ionic fluids and uses metal processing as an example. Charge transport is shown to be governed by fluidity and there is no discontinuity between molar conductivity and fluidity irrespective of cation, charge density or ionic radius. Diffusion coefficients of iron(III) and copper(II) chloride in numerous concentrated ionic fluids show the same linear correlation between diffusion coefficient and fluidity. These oxidising agents were used to etch copper, silver and nickel and while the etching rate increased with fluidity for copper, etching of silver and nickel only occurred at high chloride and low water activity as passivation occurred when water activity increased. Overall, brines provide a high chloride content at a lower viscosity than DESs, but unlike DESs, brines are unable to prevent passivation due to their high water content. The results show how selective etching of mixed metal waste streams can be achieved by tuning chloride and water activity.

Role of Oxidants in Metal Extraction from Sulfide Minerals in a Deep Eutectic Solvent

“…In the case of precious metals, it has been reported that oxidative leaching in IL media improves the extraction of silver, while gold extraction was found similar to that achieved in the aqueous system. − In DES media, it has been demonstrated that electrum, native Te, and tellurobismuthite are soluble by oxidation with iodine . This study shows very interesting results but lacks a comparison with the aqueous system and has been conducted only with very short leaching times.…”