“…In the past two decades, the class of square-planar cyclometalated Pt(II) complexes has been extensively investigated because of their interesting phosphorescence nature, − but there are only a finite number of chiral Pt(II) complexes for the applications in CP-OLEDs. − In 2016, Brandt et al used helicene-based Pt(II) complexes [Figure a, (C^N)*Pt(O^O), C^N = ( P )/( M )-pyridinyl-helicene, O^O = β-diketones] to construct solution-processed CP-OLEDs, which have a high g EL (+0.22 and −0.38) but a low power efficiency (η P = 0.23 lm W –1 ) . After that Yan et al introduced −F and −CF 3 moieties at a pyridinyl-helicene ligand to increase the volatility and emission intensity for vacuum-evaporated CP-OLEDs (EQE = 18.8%, g EL = 1.6 × 10 –3 ). , Han et al [(N^C^N)Pt(≡R)*, N^C^N = 1,3-bis(2-pyridyl, ≡R = ( R )/( S )-(+)-α-methylbenzylisocyanide, solution-processed CP-OLEDs, luminance efficiency η L = 0.84 cd A –1 , g EL ≈ 10 –4 ], Lee et al [(N^C^N)*Pt(Cl), N^C^N = ( R )/( S )-1-(2-oxazoline)-3-(2-pyridyl)phenylate, vacuum-evaporated CP-OLEDs, EQE = 9.7%, g EL = 1.2 × 10 –4 ], and Fu et al [Figure b, (C^N)Pt(N^O)*, C^N = 1-(benzo[b]-thiophen-2-yl)-isoquinoline, N^O = ( R )/( S )-Schiff base ligands; solution-processed CP-OLEDs, EQE = 0.93%, g EL ≈ 10 –3 ] adopted point-chirality-ligand-based Pt(II) complexes to fabricate CP-OLEDs. Qian et al further utilized a liquid crystal to improve the EL performance of point-chirality-ligand-based Pt(II) complexes [(N^C)*Pt(O^O), N^C = ( R )/( S )-2-phenylpyridine derivate, solution-processed CP-OLEDs, EQE = 11.3%, g EL = 0.02] .…”