1973
DOI: 10.1021/es60076a001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentrations, decay rates, and removal of ozone and their relation to establishing clean indoor air

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
94
0
6

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
7
94
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Such measurements have been made in numerous types of buildings, including residential, commercial and public structures. In studies conducted by Shair and coworkers at selected California Institute of Technology buildings (Sabersky et al, 1973;Hales et al, 1974;Shair, 1981), the indoor ozone concentrations were found to closely track outdoor concentrations and to be dependent on the air exchange rate. More recent examples of simultaneous indoor and outdoor ozone measurements include multiple locations in a Red Bank, New Jersey, USA office complex (Weschler et al, 1989(Weschler et al, , 1991(Weschler et al, , 1992, a telephone office in Burbank, California, USA (Weschler et al, 1994a, b), and six New Jersey homes (Zhang et al, 1994a).…”
Section: Indoor Ozone Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such measurements have been made in numerous types of buildings, including residential, commercial and public structures. In studies conducted by Shair and coworkers at selected California Institute of Technology buildings (Sabersky et al, 1973;Hales et al, 1974;Shair, 1981), the indoor ozone concentrations were found to closely track outdoor concentrations and to be dependent on the air exchange rate. More recent examples of simultaneous indoor and outdoor ozone measurements include multiple locations in a Red Bank, New Jersey, USA office complex (Weschler et al, 1989(Weschler et al, , 1991(Weschler et al, , 1992, a telephone office in Burbank, California, USA (Weschler et al, 1994a, b), and six New Jersey homes (Zhang et al, 1994a).…”
Section: Indoor Ozone Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, fleecy surfaces have more surface area than smooth surfaces. Rooms with fleecy surfaces such as carpeting, drapes and upholstered furniture tend to have larger surface removal rates for ozone than rooms without such appointments (Mueller et al, 1973;Sabersky et al, 1973). Hence the bedroom in Table 3 has a larger surface removal rate constant than offices with similar dimensions.…”
Section: Removal By Indoor Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this range a central value of 5 × 10 --5 was selected for concrete--faced cracks. For plywood (using the same value for wood surfaces): γ = 4.7 × 10 --6 to 5.8 × 10 --7 [18]. A central value of 1 × 10 --6 was used in the calculations.…”
Section: Ozone Removal By the Building Envelopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ozone, the rate constant K was measured for several common surface materials by Sabersky et al 7 and Mueller et al, 23 who also measured Al V ratios for an office and a bedroom. The value of K was found to depend both on the surface material (cloth, for example, is more effective in removing ozone than is wallboard) and on the relative humidity (the higher the relative humidity is, the greater is the ozone removal rate).…”
Section: Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the A/V ratio for offices is typically smaller than for homes, while the A/V ratio for an automobile is much greater than either. The KA/V values used by PAQM for ozone were obtained as follows: The 21-building CalTech study 7 found that the average A/V ratio among the buildings surveyed was 0.275 ft" 1 . Assuming that this ratio is typical of offices generally, the corresponding KA/V value is 1.65 hr" 1 (assuming K to be 0.1 ft 3 /ft 2 -min).…”
Section: Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%