2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-007-9383-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentrations of the Allelochemical (±)-Catechin IN Centaurea maculosa Soils

Abstract: The phytotoxin (+/-)-catechin has been proposed to mediate invasion and autoinhibition by the Eurasian plant Centaurea maculosa (spotted knapweed). The importance of (+/-)-catechin to C. maculosa ecology depends in part on whether sufficient catechin concentrations occur at appropriate times and locations within C. maculosa soil to influence neighboring plants. Previous research on catechin in C. maculosa soils has yielded conflicting results, with some studies finding high soil catechin concentrations and oth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
86
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
86
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Perry et al (2007) report that detection of (+/-)-catechin in soils associated with SK was infrequent and, when detected, the levels were lower then previously reported. Similarly, Blair et al (2006) report that (+/-)-catechin measured in soils associated with long-term infested SK sites was either undetected or detected at low levels (three orders of magnitude less than levels reported earlier and responsible for growth inhibition in sensitive native species), and that soil moisture appears to be an important factor regulating (+)-catechin soil levels.…”
Section: Plant Rootmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Perry et al (2007) report that detection of (+/-)-catechin in soils associated with SK was infrequent and, when detected, the levels were lower then previously reported. Similarly, Blair et al (2006) report that (+/-)-catechin measured in soils associated with long-term infested SK sites was either undetected or detected at low levels (three orders of magnitude less than levels reported earlier and responsible for growth inhibition in sensitive native species), and that soil moisture appears to be an important factor regulating (+)-catechin soil levels.…”
Section: Plant Rootmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Recent studies question the importance of (+/-)-catechin as the allelochemical responsible for the successful spread of SK (Blair et al, 2006;Perry et al, 2007). Perry et al (2007) report that detection of (+/-)-catechin in soils associated with SK was infrequent and, when detected, the levels were lower then previously reported.…”
Section: Plant Rootmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For each geocytotype, individuals with the same number come from the same population which suggests that a belowground mechanism may be involved in the invasive success of this species. The invasion success of C. maculosa has long been thought to be due to the release of an allelopathic chemical into the soil (Ridenour and Callaway 2001;Callaway and Ridenour 2004), but opinions vary on this question (Blair et al 2006;Perry et al 2007). Our findings suggest a possible invasion mechanism related to the ability to modify bacterial communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C. maculosa has been demonstrated to be allelopathic (Ridenour and Callaway 2001). This species is known for its release of (±) catechin into the soil (Bais et al 2002), and catechin has been thought to be responsible for allelopathic effects, although recent arguments claim that the amount released into the soil is too small to be able to induce allelopathic effects (Blair et al 2006;Perry et al 2007).…”
Section: Model Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(-)-catechin is considered a potent phytotoxin, whereas (+)-catechin is a weaker phytotoxin with some antimicrobial activity (Bais et al 2002(Bais et al , 2003Ridenour and Callaway, 2001). However, its role has recently been criticised due to the low concentration of (-)-catechin found in soils with C. maculosa, that exhibit values considered very low to cause significant damage (Duke et al, 2009;Perry et al, 2007). These last authors also report this phytotoxin cannot cause oxidative damage because this molecule can be quickly degraded by extracellular root enzymes.…”
Section: Weedsmentioning
confidence: 99%