Concept Analysis of Empowerment in Old People with Chronic Diseases Using a Hybrid Model

Fotoukian, Z; Shahboulaghi, Farahnaz Mohammadi; Fallahi-Khoshknab, Masoud; Mohammadi, Elham

doi:10.1016/j.anr.2014.04.002

Cited by 44 publications

(58 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Seventeen definitions (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) (Chart 1) and seven dimensions (9,14,(24)(25)(26)(27)(28) of empowerment (Chart 2), and 10 empowerment measures (9,13,24,(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35) (Chart 3) were selected. The analysis showed that the concept of empowerment has been broadly used in the health sciences field, especially over the last 10 years.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fotoukian et al, 2014 (14) personal control, self-regulation, all of which have a generally equivalent meaning. The latter characteristics are considered individual attributes, and one can only talk of empowerment when these processes have an impact on the community, that is, when individuals actively participate in the community or organization (38)(39) .…”

Section: Definitions Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Concepts and measures of patient empowerment: a comprehensive review

Cerezo¹,

Juvé‐Udina

Delgado‐Hito

2016

Rev. esc. enferm. USP

121

114

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Analyze the definitions and dimensions of empowerment. Identify the strengths and weaknesses of empowerment measures based on the conceptual model. Method: This was a comprehensive literature review of publications on the MEDLINE and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases. Results: Twenty-nine articles were selected. Seventeen definitions and seven dimensions of empowerment, and 10 empowerment measures were selected. Empowerment can be seen as an enabling process involving a shift in the balance of power, or as an outcome of this process. The dimensions reflect outcome indicators, such as participation in decisionmaking and control, and process indicators, such as knowledge acquisition and coping skills. Six of the tools analyzed by this study could be said to provide a robust measure of patient empowerment. Conclusion: we propose a definition of empowerment that helps to deepen understanding of the term and, therefore, its operationalization.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Definitions Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Concepts and measures of patient empowerment: a comprehensive review

Cerezo¹,

Juvé‐Udina

Delgado‐Hito

2016

Rev. esc. enferm. USP

121

114

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This was a study with a qualitative design and concept analysis method with hybrid model approach in three phases: theoretical, fieldwork, and a final analytical approach with the help of deductive-inductive reasoning (15). Using the method that was described by Walker and Avant (2005), the authors clarify the concepts that are vague and have multiple meanings in different contexts.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Concept Analysis of Clinical Judgment in Nursing Students: A Hybrid Model

Pouralizadeh¹,

Khankeh²,

Ebadi³

et al. 2017

Iran Red Crescent Med J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Clinical judgment (CJ) is a complex process and is one of the most important concepts in the domain of education of the nursing students. Despite the special importance of its concept in nursing, this term still has not created an equal perception in the minds of many experts in the nursing education and no study has been done in order to define and explain this concept by concept analysis of the "CJ" in the educational domain. Objectives: The current study was done with the purpose of determining dimensions and features of this concept in the domain of clinical education of nursing students in Iran. Methods: The design of this study is qualitative with concept analysis method and hybrid model approach. It was done in three phases that were described by Walker and Avant. In the theoretical stage, reviews on the related and valid articles were accomplished. The articles were assessed and analyzed in order to present the working definition. In the stage of field work, the interview was done with 17 participants including 7 nursing students, 6 teachers, and 4 clinical instructors. In the final stage, the general analysis was done and the antecedents, attributes, and the consequences of the concept were extracted. Results: According to the final analysis, CJ for the nursing students is a cognitive and reasoning process, in order to achieve which, the nursing students by guidance of teachers in a secure clinical environment, assess the patients' needs, interpret, and evaluate the patients' response to the clinical practice and then reflect and perform the critical evaluation of the patients' conditions. In the meanwhile, making effective clinical decisions, increasing the trust of patient and quality of care, the necessary conditions for the promotion of their professional competence will be provided. Conclusions:In the concept analysis of CJ, some of the needed conditions for CJ in the nursing students have not been reported in the studies.

show abstract

“…특히, 유방암 여성들은 자가관리를 위해서 동병상련을 나눌 수 있는 자조집단 활 동에 참여하고 [13], 유방암 인식 개선과 유방암 여성의 권익 향상을 위한 핑크리본 캠페인에 동참하고 있다 [14]. 유방암 [8,23,27], 여성성 수용 [28], 자기통제 [6,8,22,27,28], 자기효능 [17,19,23,27], 자기결정 [8,17,23] 으로 하였고, 이는 유방암으로 인해 손상된 여성성을 긍정적으로 회 복하고 목적 달성을 위하여 자율적인 선택을 시행하며 자신의 삶을 조절하고자 하는 주도적인 역량을 의미한다. 상호작용적 요인의 개 념적 지표는 가족 대인관계 [5,10], 동료 대인관계 [7,10,23,27], 의료 인 대인관계 [7,9,18,20,21] Figure 2).…”

unclassified

Development and Validation of the Empowerment Scale for Woman with Breast Cancer

Shin

Park

2015

J Korean Acad Nurs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

연구의 필요성유방암은 유방암여성 임파워먼트 측정도구 개발 및 타당화Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a scale to evaluate empowerment in woman with breast cancer and to examine the validity and reliability of the scale. Methods: The development process for the initial items included a literature review, interviews, and construction of a conceptual framework. The identified items were evaluated for content validity by experts, resulting in 3 factors and 48 preliminary items. Participants were 319 women with breast cancer recruited to test reliability and validity of the preliminary scale. Data were analyzed using item analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, criterion related validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Results: The final scale consisted of 30 items and 3 factors. Factors, including 'intrapersonal factor' (14 items), 'interactional factor' (8 items), and 'behavioral factor' (8 items), were drawn up after confirmatory factor analysis. Goodness of fit of the final research model was very appropriate as shown by χ 2 /df=1.86, TLI=.90, CFI=.92, SRMR=.06, and RMSEA=.05. Criterion validity was evaluated by total correlation with the Cancer Empowerment Questionnaire .78. Cronbach's alpha for total items was .93 and test-retest reliability was .69. Conclusion: Findings from this study indicate that the scale can be used in the development of nursing interventions to promote the empowerment of women having breast cancer. If the original work is properly cited and retained without any modification or reproduction, it can be used and re-distributed in any format and medium.

show abstract

Concept Analysis of Empowerment in Old People with Chronic Diseases Using a Hybrid Model

Abstract: The concept analysis of empowerment showed some of the required conditions for the empowerment of older people with chronic diseases in nursing care, which have not been mentioned in the literature.

Cited by 44 publications

References 33 publications

Concepts and measures of patient empowerment: a comprehensive review

Concepts and measures of patient empowerment: a comprehensive review

Concept Analysis of Clinical Judgment in Nursing Students: A Hybrid Model

Development and Validation of the Empowerment Scale for Woman with Breast Cancer

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About