Concept and Structure of Tolerance (Experience of Theoretical Research)

Abstract

Norms and values in societies are different in civilizational, historical, and ethnical aspect because they were formed according to the specific historical needs of each society. They contain the requirements for both intolerant and tolerant attitude towards ‘others’. The modern concept which social scientists use to try to grasp the sense of “peaceful coexistence in a multicultural society” is the concept of ‘tolerance’. Social science borrowed the concept of tolerance from medicine where tolerance is defined as a neutral or insignificant reaction of a living being to biologically active substances and objects that enter it. In social science itself, tolerance appears as a compromise (conflict-free) behavior in a multicultural society. According to the principles of organization, tolerance is divided into radical (fundamental non-violence) and moderate (civil society). Based on behavior, tolerance represents four levels: 1) unconscious tolerance (symbiosis); 2) conscious (educated) tolerance (indifference, conformism, understanding, consent); 3) self-serving (interaction, cooperation, solidarity); 4) actual (emotional) tolerance (affection, reciprocity, infatuation, love). In total, we get 22 (4 conscious + 3 self-serving + 4 actual) × 2 (radical and moderate) types of tolerance, plus unconscious tolerance/symbiosis. The problem of tolerance is the problem of the correlation of good and harm arising from compromise (conflict-free) behavior in a multicultural society. Therefore, tolerance is an individual measure of good/harm arising from compromise (conflict-free) behavior in a multicultural society. Values can be normative (individual measure of good/harm corresponding to their social measure) and non-normative (individual measure of good/harm not corresponding to their social measure). The absence of a definition of tolerance in modern legislation indicates the normative nature of this value. Consequently, tolerance is a non-normative value of compromise (conflict-free) behavior in a multicultural society. Aim: theoretical study and definition of the concept and structure of tolerance.
 Keywords: tolerance, value, norm, structure of tolerance

Concept and Structure of Tolerance (Experience of Theoretical Research)

“…[33] Immunologists R. Burnet, R. Billingham, L. Brent, and M. Hasek, disciples of Peter Medawar, finalized the definition of tolerance as "the ability of a body to endure potentially unfavorable environmental factors such as a decrease in the sensitivity of the body, cells, and tissues to the impact of a substance, which helps maintain homeostasis". [42] From then on, the concept of tolerance has been borrowed by pharmacology, medicine, and psychiatry. Pharmacologist S. Kutsienko defines tolerance as "a decrease in the response to repeated administration of drugs or psychoactive substances which requires an increased dosage to attain the effect inherent in the substance".…”