Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3106426.3106498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concept-aware geographic information retrieval

Abstract: Textual queries are largely employed in information retrieval to let users specify search goals in a natural way. However, di erences in user and system terminologies can challenge the identi cation of the user's information needs, and thus the generation of relevant results. We argue that the explicit management of ontological knowledge, and of the meaning of concepts (by integrating linguistic and encyclopaedic knowledge in the system ontology), can improve the analysis of search queries, because it enables … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice also that OnToMap does not assume to work on RDF data in order to comply with more general data sources, like public crowdmapping platforms, thanks to the mediation of its domain ontology. Moreover, it supports: (i) a browsing-based exploration guided by the structure of the domain ontology, which makes it possible to search for information following both IS-A and semantic relations; (ii) the semantic interpretation of free text queries to identify the data categories (ontology concepts) of interest by abstracting from the specific words occurring in the queries, via Natural Language Processing (Ardissono et al, 2016;Mauro et al, 2017). More generally, OnToMap enables search support over a configurable set of data categories; in this way, it enables complex map development on different information domains.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice also that OnToMap does not assume to work on RDF data in order to comply with more general data sources, like public crowdmapping platforms, thanks to the mediation of its domain ontology. Moreover, it supports: (i) a browsing-based exploration guided by the structure of the domain ontology, which makes it possible to search for information following both IS-A and semantic relations; (ii) the semantic interpretation of free text queries to identify the data categories (ontology concepts) of interest by abstracting from the specific words occurring in the queries, via Natural Language Processing (Ardissono et al, 2016;Mauro et al, 2017). More generally, OnToMap enables search support over a configurable set of data categories; in this way, it enables complex map development on different information domains.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Huang et al [17] and Chen et al [8] detect term co-occurrence in search sessions to group sets of relevant words that can be mutually suggested. Our work is di erent because we adopt a linguistic interpretation approach (based on lemmatization and Word Sense Disambiguation) to nd the concepts referenced in the queries; see [27]. erefore, we extract information about concept co-occurrence, which is more general than term co-occurrence.…”
Section: Analysis Of Interaction Sessionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complexity of queries writing is also a remaining challenge when it comes to ontology uses in knowledge discovery (Munir & Sheraz Anjum, 2018). Some proposition tried to consider textual queries instead of simple words matching between lists (Mauro et al, 2017). Nevertheless, these examples do not reflect human languages complexity and limit their proposition to terms matching.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%