2016
DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2015.1117076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptions and practices of educators at child sheltering institutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Care practices that presented significant differences between the RMB and IE groups (N = 110). time of service (Cavalcante, 2008;Corrêa et al, 2016;Magalhães, Costa, & Cavalcante, 2011;Pereira et al, 2010;Tinoco & Franco, 2011). It should be noted that the presence of the male figure in care may result in differentiated models for the development of the child, according to Bueno, Gomes and Crepaldi (2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Care practices that presented significant differences between the RMB and IE groups (N = 110). time of service (Cavalcante, 2008;Corrêa et al, 2016;Magalhães, Costa, & Cavalcante, 2011;Pereira et al, 2010;Tinoco & Franco, 2011). It should be noted that the presence of the male figure in care may result in differentiated models for the development of the child, according to Bueno, Gomes and Crepaldi (2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature emphasizes that the process of housing in shelters can be a risk and protection factor for children away from family life, and the importance of investigations regarding the characteristics of educators and care practices to subsidize intervention and training plans (Cavalcante, 2008;Corrêa et al, 2016;Nelson et al, 2014;Nogueira & Costa, 2005). Thus, the present study brings contributions to the area by exploring the profile and practices of care in the Metropolitan Region of Belém and interior of the state, revealing points of similarities and differences in the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation