2012
DOI: 10.21307/apex-2012-007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptions of Giftedness in a Global, Modern World: Where are We at in Aotearoa New Zealand, 2012?

Abstract: Conceptions of giftedness have undergone several paradigm shifts in recent decades. Giftedness in the New Zealand context has been influenced by these shifts and consequently there are implications for educators in New Zealand. Conceptual understandings influence the pedagogical decisions made about gifted education as a whole and it is thus important for educators to be confident in their understanding of the conceptions that guide programmes and policy in their own school or centre. This paper reviews some o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Tall Poppy Syndrome espouses the benefits of egalitarian approaches and rejects giftedness, considering that it unfairly gives special privileges to some children (Henshon, 2007;Moltzen, 2004;Silverman, 2000;Porter, 2008). This discourse results in confusion for families who experience confusing or negative experiences and outcomes for their gifted children as a result of the children being "cut down to size", held back, ignored because they are ahead of their peers and it is thus assumed they need no support, negatively reacted to or, misunderstood, ignored or forgotten (Bicknell, 2006;Cathcart, 1994;Margrain, 2005Margrain, , 2010Moltzen, 2004;Radue, 2009;Tapper, 2012).…”
Section: New Zealand Policy Context For Gifted Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tall Poppy Syndrome espouses the benefits of egalitarian approaches and rejects giftedness, considering that it unfairly gives special privileges to some children (Henshon, 2007;Moltzen, 2004;Silverman, 2000;Porter, 2008). This discourse results in confusion for families who experience confusing or negative experiences and outcomes for their gifted children as a result of the children being "cut down to size", held back, ignored because they are ahead of their peers and it is thus assumed they need no support, negatively reacted to or, misunderstood, ignored or forgotten (Bicknell, 2006;Cathcart, 1994;Margrain, 2005Margrain, , 2010Moltzen, 2004;Radue, 2009;Tapper, 2012).…”
Section: New Zealand Policy Context For Gifted Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conception of giftedness is a sociocultural phenomenon (Tapper, 2012) that can change with time and place and, whatever its nature, intervenes in the acceptance or social rejection of the gifted and their abilities. Therefore, conceptions of giftedness need to be studied in each particular environment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A partir del discurso de los profesores se puede inferir que estos conceptualizan el talento académico dentro de una visión contemporánea en la que se le reconoce como producto de factores personales y de condiciones ambientales y no solamente como producto de una habilidad excepcionalmente alta (Kaufman & Sternberg, 2008). Este primer hallazgo en la misma línea de los reportados por Chan & Yuen (2015) y Olthouse (2014) -y a diferencia de los reportados por Flanagan & Arancibia (2005) -, muestra una conceptualización del talento más inclusiva y menos tradicional (Tapper, 2012) producto de otras características -motivación, compromiso con sus intereses, rapidez en el aprendizaje-más allá de un componente innato.…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified
“…Estas iniciativas se enfocan en un grupo particular de niños con talento académico sin considerar concepciones más contemporáneas (Tapper, 2012), como aquellas que enmarcan el talento como una propiedad emergente de factores personales tanto como de condiciones ambientales (Kaufman & Sternberg, 2008). Si nos posicionamos en esta última, es muy probable que al aula regular asistan niños con talento que al no acceder a los programas de enriquecimiento existentes, y al no ser visibilizados por el sistema escolar, su talento no se promueve ni desarrolla.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified