1993
DOI: 10.1021/jm00073a001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concepts and progress in the development of peptide mimetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, previous structure-activity studies suggested that the central part of the peptide behaves more like a molecular spacer responsible for positioning the N-and C-domains and might not be involved directly in the interaction with the PAC1 receptor. Such a hypothesis has already been proposed for other members of the VIP-glucagon-GHRF-secretin superfamily (Olson et al 1993). To evaluate this postulate, a library of eight hybrid peptides containing an aliphatic flexible molecular spacer connecting the N-terminal disordered domain to the helical C-terminal region was designed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In fact, previous structure-activity studies suggested that the central part of the peptide behaves more like a molecular spacer responsible for positioning the N-and C-domains and might not be involved directly in the interaction with the PAC1 receptor. Such a hypothesis has already been proposed for other members of the VIP-glucagon-GHRF-secretin superfamily (Olson et al 1993). To evaluate this postulate, a library of eight hybrid peptides containing an aliphatic flexible molecular spacer connecting the N-terminal disordered domain to the helical C-terminal region was designed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Longer templates and particularly templates which specifically address 3-D-vectorial positioning of termini are much less common. Notable examples before 1994 are cited in an excellent review by Olsen et al (92), and more recent examples are due to Robinson (82,88,93), Schreiber (94), and Chmielewski (95). It is of course important also to consider the degree of flexibility afforded by a potential template.…”
Section: Structure-based Design Of Antiallergic Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, we affirmed that the designed peptides can bind to human profilins (K89, T91 or T96) in the docking simulation (data not shown). Although this crossreaction would be attributed to conformational flexibility of the peptide, the affinity or specificity can be ameliorated by constraining the conformational flexibility in the peptidomimetics approach (Olson et al, 1993). The penetration problem could be solved by attaching a cell penetrating peptide, such as a Tat-peptide (Henriques et al, 2006;Park et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%