1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5096(98)00107-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concepts for bridged Mode ii delamination cracks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases, the calculated G increases slightly in the initial crack growth region less than 20 mm, then it settles back to the expected values. These numerical results manifest the ACK limit as discussed in [10,11]. When the crack growth exceeds this limit, the critical shear stress criterion can be accurately applied to simulate crack growth.…”
Section: Model Verificationsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In both cases, the calculated G increases slightly in the initial crack growth region less than 20 mm, then it settles back to the expected values. These numerical results manifest the ACK limit as discussed in [10,11]. When the crack growth exceeds this limit, the critical shear stress criterion can be accurately applied to simulate crack growth.…”
Section: Model Verificationsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…However, in doing so, it could be difficult to obtain an analytical closed form solution. Same theories and similar approaches have been applied by Massabo et al [10,11] to examine a bridged mode II delamination in detail from an analytical and conceptual viewpoint. For example, they have discussed two limiting crack configurations: the small-scale bridging limit when the bridging zone size is constant and much smaller than the crack length; and the ACK limit when the critical applied shear stress is independent of crack length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, equation (3b), which accounts for structural depth, generally provides the best correlation with numerical results, but it is necessary to apply M = 0.5 to gain a close match. Previous work by Massabo and Cox [22] has shown that the equivalent mode II modulus in the characteristic length equation for slender bodies, E' II,slender , takes the same value as the longitudinal modulus, E 11 , and is influenced by no other elastic moduli. However, the cohesive zone length in the 3ENF specimen is seen to increase from a value of 3mm for a shear modulus, G 13 lengths for mode II are significantly longer.…”
Section: (Insert Figure 13)mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Delamination arrest can persist under increasing load and failure then occurs by some other mechanism [14]. Fracture predictions must be based on large scale bridging models, in which the effect of the mixed mode tractions applied to the fracture surfaces by the through-thickness reinforcement is considered explicitly [17]. The use of K-formulae assuming an unbridged crack to deduce a fracture toughness value is inadequate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%