Concepts of transdisciplinary engineering: a transdisciplinary landscape

Abstract

The term 'transdisciplinary' is receiving increased attention within engineering academic and research funding communities. We survey authors of papers presented at the 27 th ISTE International Transdisciplinary Engineering Conference (TE2020) to answer two research questions: 1) How do authors define transdisciplinary engineering? 2) What do authors perceive differentiates interdisciplinary engineering research from transdisciplinary engineering research? Responses from thirty-four participants (50%), are qualitatively analysed. Results show that for the three characteristics commonly used in characterisations of transdisciplinarity (goal, collaboration and integration), multiple concepts exist. These range from generic expressions which overlap with how interdisciplinarity is defined within the general literature, to stronger, more definitive expressions. Conclusions find that rather than a single definition a transdisciplinary landscape exists. To enable users to define where they sit in the transdisciplinary landscape, we create a framework enabling users to map their position under the three key characteristics of goal, collaboration and integration.

European Union Conceptualisation of Industry 5.0: Opportunities and Challenges for Transdisciplinary Engineering

“…However, as identified by the participants, their definition of transdisciplinarity may be different from that held within the TE community. Indeed, as highlighted in the work of Lattanzio et, al., even within the community there is not a single definition, but rather a landscape containing weak and strong conceptualisations [29]. To respond to funding calls having a common understanding, or at least of a way of articulating similarities and differences will be key.…”

Managing and Governing Integrated Research Programmes: Lessons from Organizational Studies

“…Finally, programmes are often partially "worker-controlled", in the sense that researchers on the "ground-floor" influence the direction of the overall programme. Like cooperatives, programmes thus face the challenge of how to ensure that the democratic costs 4 that arise from such (partial) control are well-managed.…”

“…Increasingly, funding bodies expect scientists to create large integrated research programmes that cover many different projects and involve many disciplines and stakeholders to solve complex societal problems, [e.g., 1, 2, 3]. The integrated programme layer is supposed to bring several benefits, including synergies amongst projects, efficiency-gains (e.g., avoidance of duplication), higher return on invested funds, and improved collaboration amongst researchers [4]. In addition, the sum is supposed to be greater than the individual parts.…”

Understanding Transdisciplinary Engineering in Public Policy: A Survey of Policy Actors’ Perceptions of Engineering Expertise

“…The history of TE and the emerging focus of scholars using the term gives it an almost exclusive focus on private sector, product design and manufacturing focus (e.g. [1][2]). As Wognum et al [3] have noted TE, aims to retain the core concepts of transdisciplinarity as imported from the distinct field of transdisciplinary research which is typically focused on sustainability (e.g.…”