2008
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual coherence affects phonological activation of context objects during object naming.

Abstract: In 4 picture-word interference experiments, speakers named a target object that was presented with a context object. Using auditory distractors that were phonologically related or unrelated either to the target object or the context object, the authors assessed whether phonological processing was confined to the target object or not. Phonological activation of the context objects was reliably observed if the target and context objects were embedded in a conceptually coherent scene (e.g., if the picture showed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In some cases, unnamed pictures phonologically related to the to-be-named picture or word facilitate naming which suggests that participants may automatically access the phonological representations of unnamed pictures (Morsella and Miozzo, 2002; Navarrete and Costa, 2005; Humphreys et al, 2010). However, this effect may only occur when pictures are semantically related (Oppermann et al, 2010b), thematically related (Oppermann et al, 2008), as a result of attentional effects (Roelofs, 2008; Malpass and Meyer, 2010), or strategic effects (Bloem et al, 2004). In some cases, the effect is not found at all (Jescheniak et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, unnamed pictures phonologically related to the to-be-named picture or word facilitate naming which suggests that participants may automatically access the phonological representations of unnamed pictures (Morsella and Miozzo, 2002; Navarrete and Costa, 2005; Humphreys et al, 2010). However, this effect may only occur when pictures are semantically related (Oppermann et al, 2010b), thematically related (Oppermann et al, 2008), as a result of attentional effects (Roelofs, 2008; Malpass and Meyer, 2010), or strategic effects (Bloem et al, 2004). In some cases, the effect is not found at all (Jescheniak et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Morsella and Miozzo (2002) and Navarrete and Costa (2005) found evidence of access to the phonological representation of a distractor object during target object naming when the target and distractor object were superimposed (see Oppermann, Jescheniak, & Schriefers, 2008, for evidence regarding the limitations of visual grouping effects). These findings raise the possibility that the initial phrase complexity effect results from processes occurring during the visual encoding of the scene.…”
Section: Evidence For a Phrasal Scope Of Planning In Speech Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all experiments presented in this article, a variant of the picture-word-interference paradigm (Oppermann et al, 2008(Oppermann et al, , 2010; see also Jescheniak, Hantsch, & Schriefers, 2005) was used. In this paradigm, participants are presented with displays showing two colored objects in close spatial proximity.…”
Section: Verview Of the Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%