2015
DOI: 10.3390/su7043571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual Framework for Assessing the Sustainability of Forest Fuel Reduction Treatments and Their Adaptation to Climate Change

Abstract: Applying fuel reduction treatments (FRTs) to forested landscapes can alleviate undesirable changes in wildfire benefits and costs due to climate change. A conceptual framework was developed for determining the preferred FRTs across planning periods, adapting FRTs to future climate change, assessing the sustainability of adaptive responses to climate change, and evaluating the validity of the two premises motivating this issue of Sustainability. The conceptual framework: (1) accounts for uncertainty about futur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, fuzzy TOPSIS is provided by integrating the fuzzy theory and TOPSIS method to deal with the qualitative issues. Moreover, this method can evaluate alternatives by considering the shortest geometric distances from benefit ideal solution and the longest distance from cost ideal solution [36][37][38][39]. On the other hand, some research aims at integrating the TOPSIS method with various weighting methods, such as AHP-TOPSIS, ANP-TOPSIS and so on [40][41][42].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, fuzzy TOPSIS is provided by integrating the fuzzy theory and TOPSIS method to deal with the qualitative issues. Moreover, this method can evaluate alternatives by considering the shortest geometric distances from benefit ideal solution and the longest distance from cost ideal solution [36][37][38][39]. On the other hand, some research aims at integrating the TOPSIS method with various weighting methods, such as AHP-TOPSIS, ANP-TOPSIS and so on [40][41][42].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A popular approach in constructing fuzzy conversion scales for the fuzzy TOPSIS is to determine the parameters of triangular fuzzy numbers based on a value in the interval <0; 10>. An example may be the scales proposed in [14,15]. The scales are characterized by a large spread of the triangular fuzzy number assigned to the middle category.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the area of application of the fuzzy TOPSIS in connection with fuzzy conversion scales, the method of determining the parameters of fuzzy numbers assigned to categories of the ordinal measurement scales is debatable. It usually subjectively takes place because it is most often determined by researchers or experts (see for example [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]). Therefore, the article presents a new proposal of the method for determining the parameters of fuzzy conversion scales for the fuzzy TOPSIS method based on the respondents' opinions who assess the partial criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) afforestation, reforestation or forest management to increase the carbon fixed by forests; (b) bioenergy or biomaterials as substitutive of fossil fuels or more energy intensive materials [4][5][6]; and (c) preservation of existing forests to avoid or reduce emissions due to anthropogenic disturbances (deforestation) or natural disturbances (pests, hurricanes, snowfalls or wildfires) through preventive and sustainable forest management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%