2021
DOI: 10.3233/shti210614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual Model for Behaviour Change Progress – Instrument in Design Processes for Behaviour Change Systems

Abstract: The aim of the work presented in this article was to develop a conceptual model for behavior change progress, which could be used for automated assessment of reasons for progress or non-progress. The model was developed based on theories for behavior change, and evaluated by domain experts. The information models of two prototype systems of a digital coach under development for preventing cardio-vascular diseases and stress respectively, were evaluated by comparing the content of the prototypes with concepts i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The person-tailored argumentation-based decision-support system developed as a part of this research rests on complementary theoretical frameworks developed within different fields of research to encompass the human-centric approach: (i) on human activity (Kaptelinin and Nardi, 2006 ; Lindgren and Weck, 2022 ), (ii) motivation and behavior change (Ryan and Deci, 2000 ; Prochaska et al, 2015 ; Lindgren and Weck, 2021 ), (iii) argumentation theory (Walton and Krabbe, 1995 ; Bench-Capon, 2002 ; Walton et al, 2008 ), and (iv) formal argument-based dialogues for reasoning about health (Atkinson et al, 2006 ; Lindgren et al, 2020 ; Guerrero and Lindgren, 2021a , b ).…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The person-tailored argumentation-based decision-support system developed as a part of this research rests on complementary theoretical frameworks developed within different fields of research to encompass the human-centric approach: (i) on human activity (Kaptelinin and Nardi, 2006 ; Lindgren and Weck, 2022 ), (ii) motivation and behavior change (Ryan and Deci, 2000 ; Prochaska et al, 2015 ; Lindgren and Weck, 2021 ), (iii) argumentation theory (Walton and Krabbe, 1995 ; Bench-Capon, 2002 ; Walton et al, 2008 ), and (iv) formal argument-based dialogues for reasoning about health (Atkinson et al, 2006 ; Lindgren et al, 2020 ; Guerrero and Lindgren, 2021a , b ).…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connection between needs, long-term goals, and short-term goals was explored by Lindgren and Weck ( 2022 ), and a model of activity encompassing the building blocks for arguments across the levels of activity was defined. Furthermore, to identify the factors affecting an individual's motivation to change behavior, a model of the behavior change progress was built based on the most influential theories on motivation and behavior change (Lindgren and Weck, 2021 ). These two models build the basis for a user model, or ToM, for the digital companion to use in dialogues with the individual in this study.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%