2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12873-020-00367-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptualizations of clinical decision-making: a scoping review in geriatric emergency medicine

Abstract: Background Clinical decision-making (CDM) is an important competency for young doctors especially under complex and uncertain conditions in geriatric emergency medicine (GEM). However, research in this field is characterized by vague conceptualizations of CDM. To evolve and evaluate evidence-based knowledge of CDM, it is important to identify different definitions and their operationalizations in studies on GEM. Objective A scoping r… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(168 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of particular note is the potential for a tendency to misinterpret information in favour of previous beliefs, patterns that could be mistaken, and subtle cues often missed by less experienced clinicians (Nagtegaal et al, 2019 ). Previous research suggests biases may be common in the care of older patients who are often given low priority for nursing care when resources are limited (Emme, 2020 ; Evripidou et al, 2021 ; Gamborg et al, 2020 ; Suhonen et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of particular note is the potential for a tendency to misinterpret information in favour of previous beliefs, patterns that could be mistaken, and subtle cues often missed by less experienced clinicians (Nagtegaal et al, 2019 ). Previous research suggests biases may be common in the care of older patients who are often given low priority for nursing care when resources are limited (Emme, 2020 ; Evripidou et al, 2021 ; Gamborg et al, 2020 ; Suhonen et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While urgency, severity or acuteness of illness are often considered by nurses to be the most important criteria for setting priorities, nurses also prioritize care using patient groups, specific diseases, age and the perceived good that care might bring for patients in different clinical settings (Suhonen et al, 2018 ). Older patients, or those not expected to recover, are often given low priority for nursing care when resources are stretched (Emme, 2020 ; Evripidou et al, 2021 ; Gamborg et al, 2020 ; Suhonen et al, 2018 ), despite evidence suggesting prioritizing older patients and high‐intensity interventions can be most effective to avoid harm (Strassner et al, 2020 ). Solutions to address missed nursing care require complex interventions that are flexible, proactive and context specific, focus on what nurses can modify, and build multidisciplinary alliances (Palese et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correct diagnosis and treatment depend on obtaining complete, reliable data from the patient through a global assessment, which includes history-taking, clinical examination, radiographs, and laboratory tests [6]. Clinical decision-making is an important part of medical education, and has been taught using a variety of methods, including computational strategies, cognitive training, and even sociology [7]- [9].…”
Section: A Serious Games For Clinical Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing CDM in emergency nurses is very challenging because of several related factors such as time and how clinical decisions are made (Gamborg et al, 2020). On the other hand, factors influencing emergency nurses' CDM such as personal values, professional attitudes, and accountability are also important barriers in the care of patients in need of forensic nursing skills (Hosseini et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%