Conceptualizing corruption prevention: a systematic literature review

Abstract

Purpose Existing reviews about corruption and anti-corruption have yet to treat the subject of prevention as the main focus of inquiry. The purpose of this paper is to address this need by analyzing definitions, theoretical underpinnings, methods and sectors of interest within published academic articles. By doing so, the main objective is to clarify the theoretical and conceptual foundations of the prevention of corruption. Design/methodology/approach The research design consists of a systematic literature review, which uses a keyword-string search method across relevant databases. A qualitative and quantitative coding scheme was implemented to provide descriptive statistics. Findings Results show a need for methodological diversity, theoretical debate and a clarification of the definitional foundations of corruption prevention. Specifically, the results underline a need for more interdisciplinary collaboration between the various fields that study the issue. To this end, a conceptualization of corruption prevention is proposed, built around a two by two matrix, to synthesize existing definitions and spark scholarly debate. Practical implications This paper contributes to the field of anti-corruption on a theoretical level by highlighting the current strengths and weaknesses of the inroads made by the existing literature. Moreover, on a practical research level, this paper suggests fruitful lines of inquiry to channel a rapidly expanding field of study. Social implications This paper underlines the need for corruption prevention policymaking to take note of the broad literature emanating from multiple social science disciplines. This paper also underlines the need for policy implementation to consider the socio-historical context and definitional idiosyncrasies of corruption for policy effectiveness. Originality/value A core original contribution of this paper is to advance a definition and conceptualization of corruption prevention. Using two conceptual axes – focus and scope – prevention tools are categorized and analyzed to spark further scholarly debate.

Crafting anti-corruption agencies’ bureaucratic reputation: an uphill battle

“…However, anti-corruption institutions have seldomly been as effective as previously intended [2,18,31,35]. Barring outlying cases, anti-corruption agencies have encountered multifaceted organisational challenges such as a lack of: structural powers, financial and human resources, or 'political will' [34].…”

A Scoping Review on Perception-Based Definitions and Measurements of Corruption

“…The rationale behind the protocol developed was used to run queries on both Elsevier B.V. # Scopus V R and Clarivate # Web of Science on February 28, 2020-a "selection of ( … ) major databases ( … ) ideal to navigate between the different social science disciplines which study corruption" (Bautista-Beauchesne & Garzon, 2019, p. 722). 3 We searched for articles published in scholarly journals, since the peer review processes ensure high-quality standards for what is accepted for publication (Bautista-Beauchesne & Garzon, 2019;Jancsics, 2019;Rowley & Slack, 2004;vom Brocke et al, 2009).…”

A systematic literature review of money mule: its roles, recruitment and awareness

“…Amid a large volume of money laundering discussions, a systematic review of literature is the ideal approach in the identification of a niche research background (Xiao and Watson, 2019). A retinue of extensive systematic literature reviews (SLR) has been found focusing on motley financial crime issues, such as money laundering research (Tiwari et al , 2020), cryptocurrency in financial crime (Trozze et al , 2022), impact of financial crime on emerging economies (Saddiq and Bakar, 2019), fraud in banking sector (Mangala and Soni, 2022), fraud triangle (Homer, 2020), corporate fraud (de Oliveira Orth and Maçada, 2020) and corruption (Bautista-Beauchesne and Garzon, 2019).…”