2015
DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2015.1034391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptualizing Emotions in Social Studies Education

Abstract: This review of research investigates how the field of social studies education conceptualizes emotions within its literature. Analysis indicates a lack of theoretical and empirical engagement with emotions, even when the presence of emotions is explicitly acknowledged. Drawing on Michalinos Zembylas's framework for researching emotions in education, the authors reveal multiple conceptions of emotions undergird research and practice, yet these are largely unexamined in the literature. The complicated nature of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These coincidences underlie a line of inquiry which has recently become stronger; it explores teaching and learning processes with regard to difficult histories, whether they refer to events that generate strong dispute between opposing versions, or to past episodes that are especially violent and traumatic (Barton & McCully, 2005;Epstein, 2009;Herrera & Rodríguez, 2012;Vélez & Herrera, 2014;Zembylas, 2014 (Bekerman & Zembylas, 2012;Garrett, 2011;Savenije, Van Boxtel & Grever, 2014;Sheppard, Katz & Grosland, 2015). Such challenges have led some "post-conflict" societies to consider options like "passing the page and looking to the future", or temporarily interrupting history teaching on the conflict, while the suffering and social polarization settle.…”
Section: Considering the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These coincidences underlie a line of inquiry which has recently become stronger; it explores teaching and learning processes with regard to difficult histories, whether they refer to events that generate strong dispute between opposing versions, or to past episodes that are especially violent and traumatic (Barton & McCully, 2005;Epstein, 2009;Herrera & Rodríguez, 2012;Vélez & Herrera, 2014;Zembylas, 2014 (Bekerman & Zembylas, 2012;Garrett, 2011;Savenije, Van Boxtel & Grever, 2014;Sheppard, Katz & Grosland, 2015). Such challenges have led some "post-conflict" societies to consider options like "passing the page and looking to the future", or temporarily interrupting history teaching on the conflict, while the suffering and social polarization settle.…”
Section: Considering the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus emotions are often relegated to a backseat in favour of truth, rationality and reason, or are simply unseen (Sheppard, Katz, and Grosland 2015).…”
Section: Caring Classrooms: How Do We Understand Care In Educational mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of history education, an increasing number of studies investigate how different societies teach about their violent past. Scholars point to the challenges of teaching about difficult histories, or uncomfortable episodes of collective memory on which there is no single narrative that is accepted by all (Barton & McCully, 2007;Cole, 2007;Garrett, 2011;Hess, 2010;Savenije, van Boxtel, & Grever, 2014;Sheppard, Katz, & Grosland, 2015;Zembylas, 2014). As competing narratives are brought to the classroom, making sense of these uncomfortable episodes of the past requires facing various intellectual, ethical and emotional complexities.…”
Section: Narrative and Narrative Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%