Objective-We examined ancestry informative markers (AIMs) to estimate the amount of population admixture and control for this heterogeneity for stage and survival in a primary head and neck squamous carcinoma (HNSCC) cohort.
Study Design-Historical cohort studySetting-Integrated health care system. Subjects-The cohort comprised 358 HNSCC who self-reported race as Caucasian American (CA), African American (AA), or Other.Methods-DNA was interrogated for West African (WA) and European genetic background by genotyping AIMs. Associations of race (self-report or WA ancestry) with stage and survival were analyzed using logistic regression and Cox regression modeling. A subgroup analysis for diagnosis (late versus early stage) and survival (time to death) and WA ancestry was performed for self-reported AAs.Results-There were significant associations between stage and self-reported race (p=0.04 {univariate}) and with cancer site (OP: p=0.014; HP: p=0.026{multivariate}). For prognosis, there were significant multivariate associations between stage (p=0.002), age (>65 years, p<.001), and cancer site (HP: p<0.001; OC: p=0.049), but self-reported race was not associated with overall survival. Interestingly, there was no association with degree of WA ancestry and stage or survival. In the sub-group analysis of genetic ancestry among self-reported AAs, cancer site remained an independent risk factor for stage (other site: p=0.026) and survival (OP: p=0.036). Late stage persisted as an independent variable for poor survival (p=0.032).Conclusions-Stratification within AAs by WA ancestry revealed no correlation with stage or survival suggesting that HNSCC outcomes with race may be due to social/ behavior factors rather than biological differences.