Concerns About Anesthetizing Palatal Tissues

Fan, ST; Chen, Wei‐Liang; Lima-Júnior, José Lacet de; Dias‐Ribeiro, Eduardo

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2010.10.029

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

2011

DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.10.029

|View full text |Cite

Concerns About Anesthetizing Palatal Tissues

ST Fan¹,

Wei‐Liang Chen²,

José Lacet de Lima-Júnior³

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2015

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The study, in which a part of it was objective, assessed the amount of local anesthetic drug through MRI (9).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Buccal Infiltration Injections of 4% Articaine on the Palatal Tissue in the Maxillary Teeth Removal

Fakour¹,

Moghadam²,

MohammadNaebi³

2015

Dent Clin Exp J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Several studies showed that 4% articaine had greater tissue penetration than other anesthetics. Objectives: The current study aimed to compare the efficacy of buccal injection of local 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine on the numbness of palatal tissue. Materials and Methods: One hundred-ninety-six patients were randomly divided into two groups of 100. A group received 4% articaine and the other group received just 2% lidocaine buccal injection. The examination of palatal tissue numbness was conducted by decole and luxation of palatal tissue. Pain assessment was conducted by verbal response scale (VRS). Results:The Chi-square test showed a significant relationship between the type of anesthesia and pain (P < 0.0001). The patients treated with 4% articaine had less pain. Conclusions: Although 4% articaine can cause more anesthesia of palatal tissue compared to 2% lidocaine, its routine use is not recommended due to its incomplete success.

show abstract

“…The study, in which a part of it was objective, assessed the amount of local anesthetic drug through MRI (9).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Buccal Infiltration Injections of 4% Articaine on the Palatal Tissue in the Maxillary Teeth Removal

Fakour¹,

Moghadam²,

MohammadNaebi³

2015

Dent Clin Exp J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Concerns About Anesthetizing Palatal Tissues

Cited by 1 publication

References 2 publications

Effect of Buccal Infiltration Injections of 4% Articaine on the Palatal Tissue in the Maxillary Teeth Removal

Effect of Buccal Infiltration Injections of 4% Articaine on the Palatal Tissue in the Maxillary Teeth Removal

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About