2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11590-018-1286-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concise complexity analyses for trust region methods

Abstract: Concise complexity analyses are presented for simple trust region algorithms for solving unconstrained optimization problems. In contrast to a traditional trust region algorithm, the algorithms considered in this paper require certain control over the choice of trust region radius after any successful iteration. The analyses highlight the essential algorithm components required to obtain certain complexity bounds. In addition, a new update strategy for the trust region radius is proposed that offers a second-o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We prove that the complexity bound O(ε −2 ) holds in both unconstrained and boundconstrained cases. In the unconstrained case, this complexity bound is the same as the known complexity bounds by Curtis [12,13], Grapiglia et al [17], and Gratton et al [18]. In the bound constrained case, our complexity bound is the same as the known complexity results obtained by Cartis et al [7,8] provided that the trust-region algorithms use the quadratic model but with the difference that it is numerically better than them.…”
Section: Some Auxiliary Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We prove that the complexity bound O(ε −2 ) holds in both unconstrained and boundconstrained cases. In the unconstrained case, this complexity bound is the same as the known complexity bounds by Curtis [12,13], Grapiglia et al [17], and Gratton et al [18]. In the bound constrained case, our complexity bound is the same as the known complexity results obtained by Cartis et al [7,8] provided that the trust-region algorithms use the quadratic model but with the difference that it is numerically better than them.…”
Section: Some Auxiliary Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…If this critical measure can distinguish numerically and theoretically spurious apparent local minimizers from good local minimizers, it is called a reasonable critical measure. A complexity bound for an iterative bound-constrained optimization method is to use a critical measure to find an upper bound on the number of iterations and terminate at an approximated local minimizer in finite precision arithmetic, e.g., see Birgin et al [2], Cartis et al [7][8][9], Curtis [12,13], Grapiglia et al [17], Gratton et al [18], Nesterov [26], and Nesterov and Polyak [27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time complexity of the fixed flow control problem depends on the particular algorithm for the nonlinear optimization. Since we use the trust-region method in this work, assuming a threshold value of on the gradient, the upper bound on the maximum number of iterations is ( Curtis et al, 2018 ). The time complexity analysis of algorithms for flow control with monitoring feedback is not considered for the following reasons.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the authors use the modified version of ρ k : where N ∈ N which is originally used by Toint [48]. Something more about trust region methods can be found in [9,18,21,22,54].…”
Section: The Computational Time Is Reducedmentioning
confidence: 99%