2009
DOI: 10.1002/nav.20364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concise RLT forms of binary programs: A computational study of the quadratic knapsack problem

Abstract: Abstract:The reformulation-linearization technique (RLT) is a methodology for constructing tight linear programming relaxations of mixed discrete problems. A key construct is the multiplication of "product factors" of the discrete variables with problem constraints to form polynomial restrictions, which are subsequently linearized. For special problem forms, the structure of these linearized constraints tends to suggest that certain classes may be more beneficial than others. We examine the usefulness of subse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted earlier, the two most common representations of the quadratic objective coefficients C ij in the literature are to either assume C ij = C ji for all i < j (so that the quadratic coefficient matrix C is symmetric) or assume C ij = 0 for all i ≥ j (so that the quadratic coefficient matrix C is upper triangular); both of which can be assumed without loss of generality. While the continuous relaxation strength of STD and STD ′ are not affected by the choice of objective function representation, the relaxation value of G1 is dependent on the manner in which the objective function of a BQP is expressed as shown in [9,10]. This follows from the fact that the quadratic objective coefficients C ij do not appear in the auxiliary constraints of STD or STD ′ , whereas they do appear in those of G1.…”
Section: Glover's Linearizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As noted earlier, the two most common representations of the quadratic objective coefficients C ij in the literature are to either assume C ij = C ji for all i < j (so that the quadratic coefficient matrix C is symmetric) or assume C ij = 0 for all i ≥ j (so that the quadratic coefficient matrix C is upper triangular); both of which can be assumed without loss of generality. While the continuous relaxation strength of STD and STD ′ are not affected by the choice of objective function representation, the relaxation value of G1 is dependent on the manner in which the objective function of a BQP is expressed as shown in [9,10]. This follows from the fact that the quadratic objective coefficients C ij do not appear in the auxiliary constraints of STD or STD ′ , whereas they do appear in those of G1.…”
Section: Glover's Linearizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quadratic Multidimensional Knapsack Problem. The next class of problems that we consider is the quadratic knapsack problem with multiple constraints, also known as the quadratic multidimensional knapsack problem (QMKP) (see [10,12]). These problems have the following form.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, we use a linearization reformulation technique (Forrester et al 2010) instead of meta-heuristics (e.g., Tabu Search) and complex specialized algorithms (e.g., Lagrangean relaxation) used in the earlier papers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%