2015
DOI: 10.21897/rmvz.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concordance between otic cytology and culture in diagnosis of external otitis canine by Malassezia spp

Abstract: Objective. To determine the correlation between microbiological culture and otic cytology for diagnoses of external otitis by Malassezia in dogs. Materials and methods. 158 ear swabs of dogs with clinical diagnosis of external otitis were analyzed by cytology, mycological culture and metabolic tests. Results. Were obtained a positive results by cytology of 62% and 75.3% by culture. The 31.1% of isolates were identified as M. pachydermatis, 12.6% as M. furfur and 56.3% were classified as Malassezia spp., becaus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That the main outcome measures focussed on clinical signs rather than cytology was deemed preferable as, even though cytology is perceived to be the “ gold standard ” for OE assessment, it is far from capturing the complex reality of the skin and ear microbiome of normal and allergic dogs [ 20 , 21 ]. Although cytology and clinical assessment are generally correlated in dogs with OE [ 22 ], it has not been possible to establish thresholds with sufficient sensitivity and specificity to allow the use of cytological endpoints in clinical studies [ 23 ]. Additionally, in this study, microbial culture was done before treatment, and culture and cytology results have been shown to generally correlate in dogs with either Malassezia [ 23 ] or microbial OE [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That the main outcome measures focussed on clinical signs rather than cytology was deemed preferable as, even though cytology is perceived to be the “ gold standard ” for OE assessment, it is far from capturing the complex reality of the skin and ear microbiome of normal and allergic dogs [ 20 , 21 ]. Although cytology and clinical assessment are generally correlated in dogs with OE [ 22 ], it has not been possible to establish thresholds with sufficient sensitivity and specificity to allow the use of cytological endpoints in clinical studies [ 23 ]. Additionally, in this study, microbial culture was done before treatment, and culture and cytology results have been shown to generally correlate in dogs with either Malassezia [ 23 ] or microbial OE [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although cytology and clinical assessment are generally correlated in dogs with OE [ 22 ], it has not been possible to establish thresholds with sufficient sensitivity and specificity to allow the use of cytological endpoints in clinical studies [ 23 ]. Additionally, in this study, microbial culture was done before treatment, and culture and cytology results have been shown to generally correlate in dogs with either Malassezia [ 23 ] or microbial OE [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cytology is a common method used for identifying Malassezia species. [9][10][11] All cytological samples were evaluated by the same person.…”
Section: Sampling Cytological Evaluation and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 43 isolates of M. pachydermatis from dogs with clinical record of otitis externa from a previous study (Pulido et al 2010) were included. The isolates were phenotypically characterized, including the evaluation of phospholipase activity (Pulido-Villamarín et al 2015), preserved in 10% skin milk at -70 °C according to the methods for preservation and storage of Malassezia species (Crespo et al 2000), and deposited at the microorganism collection from the "Unidad de Investigaciones Agropecuarias" (UNIDIA, Unit of Agricultural Research) of the "Pontificia Universidad Javeriana". In addition, Malassezia strains: M. furfur CBS 7019, M. pachydermatis CBS 1879, M. sympodialis CBS 7222 and M. slooffiae CBS 7956, obtained from the Fungal Biodiversity Center (Westerdijk Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands), were used as phenotypic and genotypic controls.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malassezia pachydermatis is one of the most common species within this genus, which is commonly isolated from mammals and birds. In dogs, it is frequently found in the external ear canal; moreover, this species may cause otitis externa and dermatitis (chronic, localized or generalized, external lesions) (Crespo et al 2002, Bond et al 2010, Pulido et al 2010, Pulido-Villamarín et al 2015. Furthermore, M. pachydermatis has been considered to be potentially zoonotic, mainly associated to fungaemia (Gueho et al 1987, Morris et al 2005, Bond et al 2010, Seyedmousavi et al 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%