2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99722-3_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concordance Comparison as a Means of Assembling Local Grammars

Abstract: Named Entity Recognition for person names is an important but non-trivial task in information extraction. This article uses a tool that compares the concordances obtained from two local grammars (LG) and highlights the differences. We used the results as an aid to select the best of a set of LGs. By analyzing the comparisons, we observed relationships of inclusion, intersection and disjunction within each pair of LGs, which helped us to assemble those that yielded the best results. This approach was used in a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The association with other information coming from the parsed corpus showed no further increase, thus, no positive synergy has been identified. This observation corroborates with what is usually seen in the literature concerning CRF for NERC task where, usually, only PoS is used as feature [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The association with other information coming from the parsed corpus showed no further increase, thus, no positive synergy has been identified. This observation corroborates with what is usually seen in the literature concerning CRF for NERC task where, usually, only PoS is used as feature [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Pirovani, J. and De Oliveira, E. [9] also used local grammar and PoS annotations associated with CRF models for NERC task, however, no proof of the synergy between these two types of features was demonstrated. Also, the highest F1 measure obtained by the proposed system (for all HAREM categories, not considering second and third levels of the hierarchy) was 60,4%, while our system achieves 75,7% for the "Time" category considering all its types and sub-types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations