2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concrete gravity dams model parameters updating using static measurements

Abstract: The structural control of concrete gravity dams is of primary importance. In this context, numerical models play a fundamental role both to assess the vulnerability of gravity dams and to control their behaviour during normal operativity and after extreme events. In this regard, data monitoring represents an important source of information for numerical model calibrations. This study proposes a novel probabilistic procedure, defined in the Bayesian framework, to calibrate the parameters of finite elements mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The static SHM systems recently proposed for gravity dams are inspired by the progress made in machine learning. Different architectures have been used to define predictive models of dam static displacements [3,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] in order to improve the accuracy of the prediction and to reduce the computational burden of the classical approaches based on functional approximation [21]. Artificial neural network, support vector machine learning, extreme machine learning, multiple linear regression and general polynomial chaos expansion have been successfully used for the approximation of static dam behaviour.…”
Section: Structural Health Monitoring Systems For Concrete Gravity Damsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The static SHM systems recently proposed for gravity dams are inspired by the progress made in machine learning. Different architectures have been used to define predictive models of dam static displacements [3,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] in order to improve the accuracy of the prediction and to reduce the computational burden of the classical approaches based on functional approximation [21]. Artificial neural network, support vector machine learning, extreme machine learning, multiple linear regression and general polynomial chaos expansion have been successfully used for the approximation of static dam behaviour.…”
Section: Structural Health Monitoring Systems For Concrete Gravity Damsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies are defined in a deterministic setting and regressive methods are used to calibrate dam predictive models. Different approaches have been proposed to improve the performance of predictive models: the hybrid simplex artificial bee colony algorithm (HSABCA) [22], boosted regression trees [23], multilevel-recursive method [17], dynamic time warping (DTW) method, local outlier factor (LOF) [24], chaotic residual errors [19], Random Forest Regression (RFR) [25] and Bayesian inference [3] have been successfully applied in the scientific literature.…”
Section: Structural Health Monitoring Systems For Concrete Gravity Damsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this context, Sevieri et al proposed a Bayesian approach for the reduction of the uncertainty related to elastic parameters of the materials based on static [31] and dynamic [26] measurements recorded by dam monitoring system. The authors proposed probabilistic hybrid predictive models for static and dynamic Quantity of Interest (QIs), such as displacements, frequencies, mode shapes, in which the dam behaviour is represented by the results of FE models.…”
Section: Source Of Uncertainties Involved In the Seismic Analysis Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the variance-based sensitivity analysis (Sobol' method, [65]) can be performed without any addition computational cost [66]. As already mentioned, the gPCE has been already applied in dam engineering both to propagate uncertainties and to build physic-based predictive models for the static and dynamic structural control [26,31]. The presence of the SSI in the FE model leads to a large number of numerical modes related to the soil motion only, while the propagation of the uncertainties changes the relative positions of modes once a set of new parameters is considered.…”
Section: Uncertainty Quantification (Uq) In the Modal Analysis Of Conmentioning
confidence: 99%