2020
DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2020.1838560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent modelling of carbonation and chloride-induced deterioration and uncertainty treatment in aging bridge fragility assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the propagation of longitudinal cracks and the cracking of concrete cover inversely result in a reduction in the confinement with the accumulation of rust products. According to the unconfined and confined stress-strain rules (i.e., BLG model, Figure 6), the residual strength of the unconfined concrete can be evaluated using Equation ( 17) [40], where K is a coefficient related to the rebar roughness and the diameter (a value K = 0.1 is used for mediumdiameter ribbed rebars), ε c (0) is the initial strain of the unconfined concrete at the peak compressive stress f pc (0) and ε t (t) is the average tensile strain in the cracked concrete at time t. The average tensile strain can be evaluated using Equation (18) [40], where n bars is the number of longitudinal rebars, r i is the width of the cross-sectional area in a pristine state and w is the crack width for each longitudinal rebar. The relationship between the crack width and cross-sectional loss of the longitudinal steel bar can be expressed as Equation ( 19) [41], where k w = 0.0575 mm −1 , ∆A s is the cross-sectional loss of a longitudinal steel bar for cracking propagation and ∆A s0 is the cross-sectional loss of the longitudinal reinforcement for cracking initiation.…”
Section: Reduction In Strength and Ductility In Corroded Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the propagation of longitudinal cracks and the cracking of concrete cover inversely result in a reduction in the confinement with the accumulation of rust products. According to the unconfined and confined stress-strain rules (i.e., BLG model, Figure 6), the residual strength of the unconfined concrete can be evaluated using Equation ( 17) [40], where K is a coefficient related to the rebar roughness and the diameter (a value K = 0.1 is used for mediumdiameter ribbed rebars), ε c (0) is the initial strain of the unconfined concrete at the peak compressive stress f pc (0) and ε t (t) is the average tensile strain in the cracked concrete at time t. The average tensile strain can be evaluated using Equation (18) [40], where n bars is the number of longitudinal rebars, r i is the width of the cross-sectional area in a pristine state and w is the crack width for each longitudinal rebar. The relationship between the crack width and cross-sectional loss of the longitudinal steel bar can be expressed as Equation ( 19) [41], where k w = 0.0575 mm −1 , ∆A s is the cross-sectional loss of a longitudinal steel bar for cracking propagation and ∆A s0 is the cross-sectional loss of the longitudinal reinforcement for cracking initiation.…”
Section: Reduction In Strength and Ductility In Corroded Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fan et al [ 12 ] established a fragility analysis framework for RC bridge structures subjected to the multi-hazard effect of vessel collisions and corrosion. Meanwhile, the modeling and analysis of the time-dependent seismic fragility due to the corrosion effects of RC bridges has received significant attention [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main reason for choosing the selected models is their relative simplicity and the availability of previous studies that adopted them which facilitates the interpretation of the results in the current study. Although other deterioration mechanisms of reinforced concrete elements are possible (e.g., carbonation-induced corrosion [6,25] and biodeterioration [26,27]), chloride-induced corrosion is generally more damaging and more costly to repair [28]. Several recent studies have focused on probabilistically assessing the impact of climate change on chlorideinduced corrosion [6,7,11,25,[29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although other deterioration mechanisms of reinforced concrete elements are possible (e.g., carbonation-induced corrosion [6,25] and biodeterioration [26,27]), chloride-induced corrosion is generally more damaging and more costly to repair [28]. Several recent studies have focused on probabilistically assessing the impact of climate change on chlorideinduced corrosion [6,7,11,25,[29][30][31]. However, none of these studies considered Nordic climate conditions with very different climate zones depending on the location.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%