2014
DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent Repeated-Sprint and Resistance Training With Superimposed Vibrations in Rugby Players

Abstract: Combined RST and resistance training induced improvements of greater magnitude in both repeated-sprint performance and muscle power output than the RST alone. The lack of substantial correlations between individual changes in repeated-sprint and muscle-power performance suggests that the same subjects were not systematically low or high responders to both RST and strength training.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
21
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The RSA improvements found in the present study after both the HIT and CT training (ES=.48 to .67) are within the range (ES=.23 to 1.63) of those previously published (Ferrari Bravo, et al, 2008;Gonzalo-Skok, et al, 2016a;Suarez-Arrones, et al, 2014). Even though the HIT program was capable to substantially improve RSA b and RSA m , the addition of EOT provided a likely better effect for all RSA measures than the solely execution of HIT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RSA improvements found in the present study after both the HIT and CT training (ES=.48 to .67) are within the range (ES=.23 to 1.63) of those previously published (Ferrari Bravo, et al, 2008;Gonzalo-Skok, et al, 2016a;Suarez-Arrones, et al, 2014). Even though the HIT program was capable to substantially improve RSA b and RSA m , the addition of EOT provided a likely better effect for all RSA measures than the solely execution of HIT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, possible underlying mechanisms related to these findings remain speculative. A very strong relationship was observed between the RSA b and RSA m enhancements (r=.77; CL 90%: .57; 090), similar to previous studies (Gonzalo-Skok, et al, 2016a;Suarez-Arrones, et al, 2014). On the other hand, while RSA s and %Dec were not improved (i.e., unclear effects) after HIT training, CT showed a substantial improvement in both variables (ES=.63 and .58, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Quantitative chances of beneficial/better or detrimental/poorer effect were assessed qualitatively as follows: < 1 %, almost certainly not; > 1-5 %, very unlikely; > 5-25 %, unlikely; > 25-75 %, possible; > 75-95 %, likely; > 95-99 %, very likely; and > 99 %, almost certain [29]. A substantial effect was set at > 75 % [49]. If the chance of having beneficial/better or detrimental/poorer performances was > 5 %, the true difference was assessed as unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 A substantial effect was set at >75%. 28 If the chances of having beneficial/better and detrimental/poorer performances were both >5%, the true difference was assessed as unclear. Otherwise, we interpreted that change as the observed chance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%