2006
DOI: 10.3758/bf03192872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent schedules of wheel-running reinforcement: Choice between different durations of opportunity to run in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PRP duration in this study was a function of inhibitory aftereffects, and there was no evidence for a difference in excitatory stimulus effects. The absence of a difference in excitatory stimulus effects as a function of wheel-running reinforcer duration is consistent with indifference on concurrent VI schedules of wheel-running reinforcement leading to different durations of opportunities to run (Belke, 2006a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…PRP duration in this study was a function of inhibitory aftereffects, and there was no evidence for a difference in excitatory stimulus effects. The absence of a difference in excitatory stimulus effects as a function of wheel-running reinforcer duration is consistent with indifference on concurrent VI schedules of wheel-running reinforcement leading to different durations of opportunities to run (Belke, 2006a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Is it an effect of the longer reinforcer duration, the longer PRP duration, both, or some other factor yet to be identified? With respect to the role of longer reinforcer duration, Belke's (2006) findings suggest that only the running occurring within the first few seconds of the wheel-running interval directly affects the operant. Beyond a few seconds, rats are indifferent in their choice between different reinforcer durations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Wheel running involves the expenditure rather than acquisition of calories. Additionally, unlike the case with food or water, it is unclear whether duration of access can be equated to magnitude of reinforcement (Belke 1997(Belke , 2006(Belke , 2007. However, like food, the efficacy of wheel running as a reinforcer is enhanced when food is withheld and body weight decreases (Belke 1996(Belke , 2004.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For example, Sherwin and Nicol (1996) demonstrated that mice are motivated to engage in wheel running, even when the cost of gaining access to a wheel is increased by requiring shallow water traverses. Not only are mice apparently willing to incur a cost to gain access to a running wheel, but also operant conditioning studies have demonstrated that both rats and mice are motivated to lever press for the opportunity to run (Belke 2006;Belke and Garland 2007 (Cagniard et al 2006;Davis et al 2008;Garland et al 2011b). The interactions of these redundant neural systems are currently poorly understood (Lenard and Berthoud 2008), but it has been demonstrated in mice (Kumar et al 2010) and humans (Cai et al 2006) that food intake and physical activity, both components of energy balance, may be governed by a similar underlying genetic architecture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Sherwin and Nicol (1996) demonstrated that mice are motivated to engage in wheel running, even when the cost of gaining access to a wheel is increased by requiring shallow water traverses. Not only are mice apparently willing to incur a cost to gain access to a running wheel, but also operant conditioning studies have demonstrated that both rats and mice are motivated to lever press for the opportunity to run (Belke 2006;Belke and Garland 2007). In addition, selective breeding for both elevated endurance capacity in rats and elevated wheel running in mice has resulted in alterations to neurobiological pathways that appear to delay the onset of exercise-induced fatigue (rats: Foley et al 2006) and increase motivation for wheel-running behavior (mice: Rhodes et al 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%