Condemned to precarity? Criminalised youths, social enterprise and the sub-precariat

Abstract

Purpose The paper aims to consider whether social enterprise, who are growing in number and seemingly a politically popular alternative to mainstream employment are a potential conduit for social change. Discussions relating to the value of (stable) employment in reducing and preventing (re)offending are not new. For many ex-offenders, a multitude of barriers stand between them and access to the labour market. As a potential conduit for social change, social enterprises are a growing and seemingly politically popular alternative to mainstream employment. Design/methodology/approach Focusing on the qualitative lived experiences of young people (aged between 16 and 18) with criminal convictions enrolled in one such enterprise, this paper examines the extent to which work-integrated social enterprise can assist in overcoming existing barriers to the labour market. Findings The paper highlights the value of social enterprise(s) in addressing the complex needs and precarities of criminalised youths, promoting social inclusion and assisting with progression into future employment. The paper also discusses the limitations of social enterprise(s) in overcoming external structural barriers to meaningful employment for those with an offending history and the implications for young people who aspire to more than precariat work. Originality/value Justice-orientated social enterprises are allowing young people with criminal records the opportunity to build social capita and access precarious work, previously unattainable for many. By focusing on the concept of “precarity”, this paper builds upon existing research on the collateral consequences of criminal convictions offering insights into the various challenges facing criminalised youths attempting to build a positive pro-social work identity within contemporary labour markets

The impact of employment upon young offenders’ identities

“…Overall, this article demonstrates that social inclusion through employment can aid the formation of a stronger prosocial identity among youths. This highlights the importance of young people being able to gain meaningful, rather than precarious, employment and the value of social enterprise in providing such employment for those who would otherwise struggle to obtain this in contemporary labour markets (for a more detailed discussion see Oswald (2021) and Soppitt, Oswald & Walker (2021)). While acknowledging the limitations of a small dataset, self-reports, supervisor's reports and official records at least suggest that this more coherent prosocial identity influenced a reduction in offending activities for young people.…”

Safety of Human–Artificial Intelligence Systems: Applying Safety Science to Analyze Loopholes in Interactions between Human Organizations, Artificial Intelligence, and Individual People

“…The precarious environment of the so-called gig economy [100] can add to the stress and fatigue long associated with driving work [101]. The more precarious survival is in changing environments, the more potential there can be for preferring not to prioritize what should be done as defined in laws, regulations, and standards [102,103]. This can be because of the combination of increased focus on the need to fulfill basic physiological needs and the depletion of self-control resources.…”

Mechanisms of Youth Participation in Governance in Kenyan Counties: A Case of Tharaka-Nithi County

“…Donors and NGOs have greatly and immensely supported a myriad interventions which have encouraged youth participation whether formally or informally [15].. Research suggests that increasing youth participation through training has intrinsic and instrumental values that could go a long way in producing positive results for young people as well as society in general. However, despite the potential benefits, the content of youth training in governance matters has remained uncoordinated and fragmented which therefore means that improved government accountability becomes limited, mixed up as well as content that is subject to misinterpretation [14].…”