2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2019.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Condition assessment of RC beams using artificial neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the hidden layers, it is worth noting that, in general, one hidden layer is sufficient. However, when the number of neurons in a single layer increases, the predictive efficiency does not increase, and for complex problems, two hidden layers could be required [10,17]. After a trial-and-error stage with one hidden layer and with a neuron number increase, the networks do not converge.…”
Section: Implementation Of the Anns: Design And Selection Of The Ann mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the hidden layers, it is worth noting that, in general, one hidden layer is sufficient. However, when the number of neurons in a single layer increases, the predictive efficiency does not increase, and for complex problems, two hidden layers could be required [10,17]. After a trial-and-error stage with one hidden layer and with a neuron number increase, the networks do not converge.…”
Section: Implementation Of the Anns: Design And Selection Of The Ann mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In civil engineering, ANNs have been successfully used in automation and optimization [2,5,8], in material formulation [9], and in system identification and monitoring [10,11]. In structural analysis and design, the following applications could be highlighted [2,6,12]: structural analysis of systems with large degrees of freedom, size optimization of structural members, joint location, shape optimization of structural types (e.g., truss geometry), topology optimization (based on deletion of ineffective structural members), and maximum stress identification and location.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the continuous improvement in social infrastructure construction techniques, structural safety is being confronted with the challenges of large volumes, complex structures, and harsh environments [1][2][3]. This can result in complications, such as delayed structural damage diagnoses and inaccurate safety evaluations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the vibrational responses acquired in a civil structure generally present nonlinear and non-stationary properties, besides having a low SNR (high-level noise), compromising negatively the results obtained by FFT to evaluate the health condition of a civil structure [25]. For this reason, in recent years, diverse methods have been proposed in the literature such as Kalman filter approaches [33], Hilbert-Huang transform (HHT) [34][35][36], time series autoregressive (AR) models [10,[37][38][39], wavelet transform-based algorithms (WT) [40,41], artificial neural networks (ANN) [11,28,[42][43][44], probabilistic-based approaches [15,18,45,46], subspace methods [12,47,48], WT-NN [49][50][51][52] and deep learning methods [53][54][55][56], among other methods or strategies. Although they have shown promising results in evaluating the condition of civil structures, these methods also present problems in identifying reliable features in noisy signals when associating them to the structure condition; in addition, some of them require repeated processing and modeling, the hand-crafted selection of the best-suited parameters, a large database, and multiple indices to detect different types of damage [57].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%