1990
DOI: 10.1108/02656719010138885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditional Zero Acceptance Number (COZAN) Plan

Abstract: A new plan is proposed for small‐sample situations using which a one‐third reduction in sample size can be achieved compared to the sample size of an equivalent zero acceptance number single sampling plan. This plan utilises the results of three successive samples for taking decision on acceptance of the lot under consideration. The plan is also robust to lot‐to‐lot quality trends.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their disadvantages are twofold. First, single sampling can impose a psychological disadvantage on the supplier, since no further reference or second chance is given for rejected lots (Govindaraju 1990;. Second, in advanced manufacturing processes, supplier production is frequently continuous, so the quality of preceding and/or successive lots is expected to be homogeneous and dependent (Kuraimani and Govindaraju 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their disadvantages are twofold. First, single sampling can impose a psychological disadvantage on the supplier, since no further reference or second chance is given for rejected lots (Govindaraju 1990;. Second, in advanced manufacturing processes, supplier production is frequently continuous, so the quality of preceding and/or successive lots is expected to be homogeneous and dependent (Kuraimani and Govindaraju 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%